silk screening is an expensive process, as death by audio have their own silk worms.
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:58 pm
by ohyeahfuzzbear
Progrockabuse wrote:silk screening is an expensive process, as death by audio have their own silk worms.
Yeah and someones got to pay for this cavern they live in...
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:11 am
by hotrodperlmutter
new GFS tuner is fucking raaaaaaaad.
also thanks to haze for lpb goodness. if the saltbooster is any better then this, i gotta gets me one.
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:39 am
by Progrockabuse
i've acquired a line 6 pod 2.0 from my mate. he's going off to uni and wanted to de-clutter. though it would come in handy for home recording, practising with headphone. some nice crunch/drive sound, not so keen on the cleans yet though only just got it. plus it was free, so fair gain i say.
any one got one and give me some tips on it, apart from smash it
might try and find a foot switch for it.
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:22 am
by blacktaxi
Progrockabuse wrote:i've acquired a line 6 pod 2.0 from my mate. he's going off to uni and wanted to de-clutter. though it would come in handy for home recording, practising with headphone. some nice crunch/drive sound, not so keen on the cleans yet though only just got it. plus it was free, so fair gain i say.
any one got one and give me some tips on it, apart from smash it
might try and find a foot switch for it.
risking to say the obvious, but.. pour beer on it?
i have that thing too, got it in a similar way as you. didn't really like the cleans too, crunch sounds are OK, metal sounds are too boomy for my taste. but yeh, pretty good for headphone practice.
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:38 am
by serfx
i'm just going to leave this picture here until i get back home to record the full demo..
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:50 am
by hotrodperlmutter
ac100 needs less front controls and more top controls.
can't wait for damo
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:41 am
by brandon.
hotrodperlmutter wrote:
new GFS tuner is fucking raaaaaaaad..
I grabbed one of those GFS tuners and it was awesome.
Sadly, it fell off the top of my amp (should have been on the floor) and the button smashed out of it...
So... don't let it fall off stuff.
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:05 am
by Haze
TULSA, OK, US
07/27/2010
4:51 A.M.
OUT FOR DELIVERY
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:50 am
by Progrockabuse
Haze wrote:TULSA, OK, US
07/27/2010
4:51 A.M.
OUT FOR DELIVERY
what you brought now haze?
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:01 am
by Haze
it rhymes with.... dwarfcraft...
*shit*
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:03 am
by Progrockabuse
the award for crappiest guess what it is post is...................
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:04 am
by Haze
I've played a friend's POD XT, same feeling about the cleans, they just weren't cutting it for me. It was great fun scrolling through the artist presets and riffing all of the classic songs out. I remember Cliffs Of Dover being spot in all aspects, the modern metal stuff like disturbed was all spot on, all of the classic rock song presets had about 15% too much gain, and the AC/DC stuff was insulting
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:25 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
disturbed is not modern metal. disturbed is modern shite.
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:49 pm
by Doog
Haze wrote:all of the classic rock song presets had about 15% too much gain
About 15% too much? Three twentieths too much? Christ, that's precise.
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:36 pm
by cobascis
Doog wrote:
Haze wrote:all of the classic rock song presets had about 15% too much gain
About 15% too much? Three twentieths too much? Christ, that's precise.
haha I was thinking the same thing
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:06 am
by Haze
little of this
putting it through its paces tomorrow since i'm last on the UPS route here. 8:15pm delvery time???
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:07 am
by Mike
Yeah, you're right - 8:15pm is far too late to Rock
