Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:34 pm
Phasers without square mode FTL 
flt?
one knob is fine.
Page 18 of 225
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:37 pm
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 8:44 pm
so how ya like it?SpectralJulian wrote:Phasers without square mode FTL
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:13 pm
I love it. Just came in the mail today- but betwen the envelope slow/fast LFO square/sine and expression pedal modes- it covers a lot of ground- the feedback sounds nice, and the start stop range controls are useful.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:22 pm
nice !
how do you like that clone theory ? i use a boss chorus on bass but i want to get rid of all the boss pedals...in time
is it much more versatile than the 'basic' clone, like ..worth the extra bucks ..lots of extra bucks?
how do you like that clone theory ? i use a boss chorus on bass but i want to get rid of all the boss pedals...in time
is it much more versatile than the 'basic' clone, like ..worth the extra bucks ..lots of extra bucks?
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:31 am
not true when it comes to the polyphase!!Gandalf wrote:flt?
one knob is fine.
Clips FTW!
I would love to here what the reissued "nanoized" polyphase sounds like.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:38 am
The coolest thing about the clone theory is how deep it can go, and the vibrato mode. Slow deep vibrato is pretty crazy. On bass, you can get very Joy Divisionesque tones (Peter Hook uses an original Clone Theory) It does boosts the signal, and when you are not playing there is some hiss, but if you put an always on boost in your chain somewhere before it, you'll never notice it.
I'll do a demo of the polyphase after I play around with it a bit more. I'm finding a lot of likable sounds out of it, but I'm going through the ropes of how to include it in my style.
I'll do a demo of the polyphase after I play around with it a bit more. I'm finding a lot of likable sounds out of it, but I'm going through the ropes of how to include it in my style.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:03 am
more knobs = more precise fucking up of sound = better.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:19 am
Word.aen wrote:more knobs = more precise fucking up of sound = better.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:02 am
Im back! and here's my baby.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:05 am
WTF
Jealous. What is that, a 50 or 100 W? and who did you kill to get it?
You're not.. IAN ARE YOU?
Jealous. What is that, a 50 or 100 W? and who did you kill to get it?
You're not.. IAN ARE YOU?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:05 am
Also you're not jumping the inputs, you fricking moron...
Ahh I feel so much better now.
Ahh I feel so much better now.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:06 am
its a 50 watt mkII
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:06 am
actually i am just not in that picMike wrote:Also you're not jumping the inputs, you fricking moron...
Ahh I feel so much better now.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:08 am
Get yourself a better quality guitar lead. Coilies are gay.
That's incredibly clean. Was it encased in Carbonite?
That's incredibly clean. Was it encased in Carbonite?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:09 am
Hmmm... perhaps, nah it has alot of digs and scratches you just cant see em intill your up close, welll you can kinda seem em on the face plate
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:11 am
Is it the JTM45 reissue?
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:11 am
No I can't.
Anyway Congrats, you have one of my wishlist heads sitting on one of my wishlist cabs.
You'd better be able to play.
Anyway Congrats, you have one of my wishlist heads sitting on one of my wishlist cabs.
You'd better be able to play.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:13 am
Uhh, I mean 1959SLPX reissue.Doog wrote:Is it the JTM45 reissue?
Either way, I'm sure your mum doesn't appreciate putting holes in those jeans.
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:16 am
That shit is 100W as far as I know. I think it's OGDoog wrote:Uhh, I mean 1959SLPX reissue.Doog wrote:Is it the JTM45 reissue?
Either way, I'm sure your mum doesn't appreciate putting holes in those jeans.
*ahem*