shortscale photography thread.

Plug your music, photography, graphics, shows of any kind or other creative works.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

I learned a pretty a cool DIY photography technique today. You basically attach a 2nd lens BACKWARDS on the front of your camera+lens setup to boost macro performance.

It's quite clever if you think about it:
A lens takes all the light outside then shrinks it down to fit on the film/sensor in the camera. So if your reverse that it takes a small area if light and increases it. But, the reversed side of a lens is bigger than film/sensor... So you attach that to your normal lens.

The light gets increased like a magnifying glass by the reverse lens, then scaled down to fit the sensor in the camera by the normal lens(which is mounted normally). It allows you to take REALLY close up images without buying an expensive specific macro lens.

My camera has a minimum focusing distance of roughly 8cm i think. But using an old 50mm lens screwed on to the front in reverse I was able to focus at less than 1cm. A 1cm area is filling the whole frame and so i can crop to get tiny details. It's how some people take photos of the eyes of insects and stuff.

Here's some test shots I did. (note I'm inside using shit lighting so the shots are quite noisy at ISO3200, outdoors in daylight they would be even clearer):
Image
Image
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

HLYSHT.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
Mages
súper crujiente
Posts: 7454
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:

Post by Mages »

badass. insane depth of field.
cogito ergo sum...thing or other...
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

Here's another I just did.


Image

Put the camera on a flat surface this time instead of handheld, so i could increase to f16 (deeper DOF) and have a lower iso (less noise) and then use a longer shutter speed to get enough light. You're never going to get a big DOF at this close range though so focusing is quite hard and very precise. I guess you could take photos of flat things to get the whole image in focus..

I might try this with some insects or something tomorrow in the daylight, could be cool.
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

Image
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

GHOST PUBES IN YR TOOTHBRUSH!!!
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

hahah. Fortunately it's not the brush I am using.
User avatar
cur
.
.
Posts: 7298
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:58 pm

Post by cur »

Ok you guys got me playing with macro again. Man I need a better camera. But I had fun playing with bees all day. Though the shiny flies were fun too.
► Show Spoiler
► Show Spoiler
Oh yeah, and pretty girl with her super cool copperhead scar.
Image

Image
Image
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

Aw that dog is so cute. Great photo too.

Here's some more I took recently:

Went for a walk in some woods:
Image

Saw these guys potholing...I was taking a photo of a tree stump (lol) and then these guys came over saying "we dug that out 30 years ago". I was a bit confused but it turned out there was a pothole just below, covered by the leaves. They started to dig it out and it was fucking tiny. I don't know how they dare to go in those things but they do, as a hobby.
Image

Image

Image
Dillon
.
.
Posts: 1666
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:03 am
Location: Colorado

Post by Dillon »

The first two of Dan's macro photos aren't showing up :( How exactly do you go about screwing a lens onto another lens, backwards? The front of the lens isn't threaded, right?
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

Ah it's cause I deleted them off my flickr stream.

Lenses are threaded on the front, so you can screw filters on. But 2 lenses both have the same thread so won't go together, i think both have 'male' threads. You can buy an male>female adapter ring.
Luckily my camera is a bit odd and has a female thread already on it so the lens can screw directly to it. I think it's because Fuji want you to buy their "official" adapter to attach filters and stuff, so they annoyingly put a female thread on instead of the usual male thread which filters work with. Kind of annoying but it works well for this reverse lens stuff.

I have heard of people using duct tape though. It's not really something you do often, it's just a bit of a fun thing to experiment with. When I first did it i just held the lens over the front, but focusing is really hard cause the depth of field becomes so tiny when up close.
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

At christmas lady Hurb done bought me a lovely Diana Camera which was very nice. It has kick started my love of photies. It is a bit of expensive hobby to start, but I love some of the pictures I have seen taken with these cameras. I was dreading getting my first roll of 120 film back. I had heard a few horror stories of peoples first rolls being really crap as getting used to the exposures on these cameras is a bit of a learning curve.
However I have just gotten my film back and I am really chuffed!

So much so I thought I would share them with you so you could say nice things hopefully?(you can be criticle too!)

Image

Image

Image

this one was taken with the pinhole

Image

Image

Image

Image

I think this was pinhole aswell
Image

Hope you like them these are just scanned from the pictures I got back no processing or anything(hence dog hairs )
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

WOW. Amazing job for a Diana! I have one too but used the 35mm back and film, just cause it's more convenient to get processed (I should get my shit together than and use medium format). And my first, and last, roll was 90% a disaster. I intend to try again though.

The 2nd to last one you posted is realllllllly nice. Perfect exposure and focus, which people take for granted with digital cameras. I'm kind of amazed it was from a Diana to be honest. Brilliant.

Also its cool to see the pinhole stuff and proper double exposures, album cover material :D

Nice one Hurb. Look forward to seeing more.
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

I went to my Dads 50th birthday party this weekend. Took something like 550 photos on the night :lol:
Image


The morning after went for a walk round Welsh Mountain Zoo, got this nice snap:
Image
User avatar
Hurb
Peanut the Kidnapper
Posts: 7203
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:47 pm

Post by Hurb »

DanHeron wrote:WOW. Amazing job for a Diana! I have one too but used the 35mm back and film, just cause it's more convenient to get processed (I should get my shit together than and use medium format). And my first, and last, roll was 90% a disaster. I intend to try again though.

The 2nd to last one you posted is realllllllly nice. Perfect exposure and focus, which people take for granted with digital cameras. I'm kind of amazed it was from a Diana to be honest. Brilliant.

Also its cool to see the pinhole stuff and proper double exposures, album cover material :D

Nice one Hurb. Look forward to seeing more.
Thank you so much for that! such nice comments. I must admit before I took a shot I read alot of info on taking pictures with the Diana which partly made me very nervous but I guess a bit prepared me for the Diana's quirks.
At first I did think about the 35mm back, but I think I like using 120 film, It feels quite special...and oldschool. just bought 21 expired rolls on ebay so hopefully that will keep me going a bit.
I think the reason I am so excited about taking pictures with this camera is each time I click the shutter it's really important as I'm only getting 12 pics per roll. I am thinking hard about each picture. When I dabbled with digital photography I would just snap away and only partly think about it. I can't do that with this camera. which is both awesome and horrible.
Thanks again, do you have any pictures from your Diana even if you don't like them. I just like looking at them.

The zoo picture is sweet, is he screaming or yawning? Love it.
Last edited by Hurb on Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
gypsyseven
.
.
Posts: 639
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:22 pm
Location: Germany

Post by gypsyseven »

DanHeron wrote: The morning after went for a walk round Welsh Mountain Zoo, got this nice snap:
Image

Nice one!
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

Ace stuff as usual, Dan.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
DanHeron
.
.
Posts: 3501
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Post by DanHeron »

Thanks. He is yawning. It was pretty depressing actually, there were 9-10 chimps in this tiny indoor space looking bored out of their minds.
User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
.
.
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:19 am

Post by UlricvonCatalyst »

Hurb wrote: I think the reason I am so excited about taking pictures with this camera is each time I click the shutter it's really important as I'm only getting 12 pics per roll. I am thinking hard about each picture.
That's the case for old skool photography in a nutshell.

I have got to finish off that roll of film that's been in my old Spotmatic for the last gazillion years.
User avatar
UlricvonCatalyst
.
.
Posts: 767
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:19 am

Post by UlricvonCatalyst »

....and a few treatments of camera phone shots:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Having a camera which effectively has no processing fees with you pretty much all the time has to be one of the best things about 21st Century living.