Tell Me About Mustang Tremolo
Moderated By: mods
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
Note to self.jamieb wrote:Absolutely everyone contributing to this thread needs to get laid.
Fuck.
If you think of god as a pair of pants, a spiritualist thinks he needs pants, in fact he wants pants but none of the conventional types of pants seem to fit just right, so he makes his own pants and is happy that his knees are no longer cold.-fibus
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
Don't worry dude, your kid'll have his own miniseries.Mike wrote:Why would you think that?
Noone can possibly play the guitar as badly as me. There can be only one.
If you think of god as a pair of pants, a spiritualist thinks he needs pants, in fact he wants pants but none of the conventional types of pants seem to fit just right, so he makes his own pants and is happy that his knees are no longer cold.-fibus
-
- .
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 5:26 am
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
Play em yet? I like my musty better than a Jaguar or a Jazzmaster.letsgocoyote wrote:Moral of the story is do I want the Mustang or do I need to pony up for a Jag/Jazz!
the world may never know
If you think of god as a pair of pants, a spiritualist thinks he needs pants, in fact he wants pants but none of the conventional types of pants seem to fit just right, so he makes his own pants and is happy that his knees are no longer cold.-fibus
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
Didn't see that comin'.
Elsewhere, as the battle continues...
Elsewhere, as the battle continues...
If you think of god as a pair of pants, a spiritualist thinks he needs pants, in fact he wants pants but none of the conventional types of pants seem to fit just right, so he makes his own pants and is happy that his knees are no longer cold.-fibus
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1022402
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
i don't believe it has to have anything to do with how somebody "wants it to be" though. the fact is, if changing the diameter of the strings by infinitesimal amounts causes everything from neck bowing to intonation to saddle fit issues, obviously there's much more to the equation than "feel." that's not to say that how a guitarist likes the touch and tension to his/her fingers isn't important, but clearly you recognize that changing string gauge has many more implications than that, right?bubbles_horwitz wrote:say for 10's we have a diameter of 10 thousandths of an inch (on the high e string), while with 11's we have a diameter of 11 thousandths of an inch. the difference in mass per inch isn't very big (i know diameter isn't mass, but the effect .001" change in diameter will have on the mass is insignificant). the difference is more noticeable on the lower strings, but it's not nearly as much as you seem to want it to be.
yes, i realize that. my point is that string gauge won't make or break a guitar. a mustang isn't gonna suck with 10's and then be magically delicious with 11's. unless you happen to prefer 11's. in which case, any guitar will feel better with them.dots wrote:i don't believe it has to have anything to do with how somebody "wants it to be" though. the fact is, if changing the diameter of the strings by infinitesimal amounts causes everything from neck bowing to intonation to saddle fit issues, obviously there's much more to the equation than "feel." that's not to say that how a guitarist likes the touch and tension to his/her fingers isn't important, but clearly you recognize that changing string gauge has many more implications than that, right?bubbles_horwitz wrote:say for 10's we have a diameter of 10 thousandths of an inch (on the high e string), while with 11's we have a diameter of 11 thousandths of an inch. the difference in mass per inch isn't very big (i know diameter isn't mass, but the effect .001" change in diameter will have on the mass is insignificant). the difference is more noticeable on the lower strings, but it's not nearly as much as you seem to want it to be.
right now i've got both my 22.5" musicmaster and my 24" jaguar strung up with 9's. there's no flopping going on. i have no tuning or buzzing issues. 'cause i set them up not to do that. i've tried lots of different strings on both of these guitars. even d'addario chromes, robroe style. and still, i always find myself back with 9's. it's what i like, and it works for me. which is my point. different guitars are better suited to different strings, but what it really comes down to is what the player prefers.
- light rail coyote
- .
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Rena, Norway
- Contact:
bubbles_horwitz wrote: different guitars are better suited to different strings, but what it really comes down to is what the player prefers.
no you are wrong and ignorant. you may "THINK" you prefer .09's on your guitar, but .11 are shortscale's true destined strings. you may beleive .09's are better, but that's only because you haven't tried hard enough to find the truth. havent you read the 10 commandments of string gauge usage. it's written in fucking stone dude
Fuzz monkeys are generally fed the most bananas