Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:45 am
less headstock angle equals cheaper production?
fender have made a grave error there then.
fender have made a grave error there then.
...or you could get a tokai or burny which are true gibson copies.nondas wrote:Fran's right. They are a bit hit and miss in the electronics department. It's one of the first mods people do (that and the input jack... and the pots... and the wiring). I own a couple of Epiphone guitars and I really like them but it's the parent company that pisses me off.Fran wrote:I've generally found Epiphone pups to be a bit lacking. I thought you would come to this conclusion Owen, thats why i recommended Tokai or Burny. Avoid the chinese stuff though. Just make a beeline for anything Jap or secondly Korean.
Case in point:
Headstock angle: Why Gibson makes their own guitars with a 17 degree headstock angle compared with the Epi 14 degree (apart from the Casino). Why go out of your way to change this feature? Because you want to ensure that those products are perceived as inferior and carry the stigma of "budget line". Chuck in some cheap pups and here you go guitarist. Looks like a Gibson, but if you're a serious guitarist you should graduate to a real Gibson. I think that's the attitude and that's business. </end rant>
that was the genius of leo fender really. he found a way to cheaply produce a quality guitar. no headstock angle, the whole neck was made out of one piece of wood. of course, as we all know, it doesn't work or sound the same as a guitar built to traditional standards. but we like them that way.Reece wrote:less headstock angle equals cheaper production?
fender have made a grave error there then.
Funnily enough, i've just had a limited edition Epiphone LP (green sparkly top) come to me for repair. The toggle switch has broke, but when i opened it up i was quite disgusted at the quality of toggle switch used. Its one of the crappy plastic £3.00 jobs. I'd expect a metal 3-way for my money is all im saying.nondas wrote:Fran's right. They are a bit hit and miss in the electronics department. It's one of the first mods people do (that and the input jack... and the pots... and the wiring). I own a couple of Epiphone guitars and I really like them but it's the parent company that pisses me off.Fran wrote:I've generally found Epiphone pups to be a bit lacking. I thought you would come to this conclusion Owen, thats why i recommended Tokai or Burny. Avoid the chinese stuff though. Just make a beeline for anything Jap or secondly Korean.
Case in point:
Headstock angle: Why Gibson makes their own guitars with a 17 degree headstock angle compared with the Epi 14 degree (apart from the Casino). Why go out of your way to change this feature? Because you want to ensure that those products are perceived as inferior and carry the stigma of "budget line". Chuck in some cheap pups and here you go guitarist. Looks like a Gibson, but if you're a serious guitarist you should graduate to a real Gibson. I think that's the attitude and that's business. </end rant>
ie. a spit roast with David Lee Roth and Lars Ulrich.Fran wrote:I'd expect a metal 3-way for my money is all im saying.
holy shit. That was written within 2 minutes of the post. There is no other forum like this in this world.benecol wrote:ie. a spit roast with David Lee Roth and Lars Ulrich.Fran wrote:I'd expect a metal 3-way for my money is all im saying.
No. Its how i would imagine a J Mascis LP to look like if he had used one.benecol wrote:Is it wrong that I don't dislike that finish?
larfzbenecol wrote:ie. a spit roast with David Lee Roth and Lars Ulrich.Fran wrote:I'd expect a metal 3-way for my money is all im saying.
You're damn right about that, kiddo.nondas wrote:holy shit. That was written within 2 minutes of the post. There is no other forum like this in this world.benecol wrote:ie. a spit roast with David Lee Roth and Lars Ulrich.Fran wrote:I'd expect a metal 3-way for my money is all im saying.
The pedal stuff is similar, particularly when I discover what people are churning out in terms of derivative design or just shoddy workmanship. I'm well chuffed you've got into the Guitar game, you've got plenty of skills and it's good to see you getting some coin as a result.Fran wrote:No. Its how i would imagine a J Mascis LP to look like if he had used one.benecol wrote:Is it wrong that I don't dislike that finish?
Its funny doing these repairs, i enjoy it and its extra money but i either end up with GAS for something similar or just get disgusted at the quality to price ratio. As example, working on that Westone Thunder puts stuff like this Epi to shame, they are not in the same league. Yet be prepared to pay £200 more for the Epi.
Thanks Mike. Im casting a bigger net as well, im on the contacts list at a few shops now. Its part of a bigger plan to earn a living from music, but this aint the thread...Mike wrote:The pedal stuff is similar, particularly when I discover what people are churning out in terms of derivative design or just shoddy workmanship. I'm well chuffed you've got into the Guitar game, you've got plenty of skills and it's good to see you getting some coin as a result.Fran wrote:No. Its how i would imagine a J Mascis LP to look like if he had used one.benecol wrote:Is it wrong that I don't dislike that finish?
Its funny doing these repairs, i enjoy it and its extra money but i either end up with GAS for something similar or just get disgusted at the quality to price ratio. As example, working on that Westone Thunder puts stuff like this Epi to shame, they are not in the same league. Yet be prepared to pay £200 more for the Epi.
DO WANT!Fran wrote:Quick witted lately are'nt we?![]()
Out of interest
committed to memory. this will be useful at some point.Mike wrote:This is even more wrong - I would rock the fuck out of that.