ShortScale.org

Concretebadger wrote:The same thing happened with the Strokes though, didn't it? Seemingly every sodding week during the early to mid 2000s, a NY-style 'garage rock' Strokes soundalike band with lazy vocals (with a different accent this time), bed hair, a name that worked on the "The [something]s" formula and in-one-ear-and-out-the-other riffs were championed by NME as the Next Big Thing. The press always latches on to whatever happens to be big at the time, and that's what happened with Oasis in the 90s. There was nothing wrong with one band sounding like Oasis; there's a lot wrong with a dozen bands trying to sound like them.

George wrote:the libertines were more responsible for that, but yeah it dominated local scenes for a long time

Yeah and no, imo. I thought of the Libertines as just another Strokes ripoff, but I suppose they maybe went on to create tons of Libertines ripoffs of their own. Ultimately I think it was the Strokes fault. I still really like that first Strokes album though.

I recommend a Yamaha silent guitar for playing oasis... But only if they are actually silent!

standing on the shoulders of giants is easily my favorite album of thiers.

the vocal track on this is fucking amazing.

drone drone drone drone drone harmonies. then the super high falsetto kicks in over the low drone on the top.


its got a some reverse in it. I love matthew sweet so I love reverse solos.



[youtube][/youtube]


i am a HUGE oasis fan. and I don't think i have ever seen this video. I may have NEVER been played in america on tv before.


this whole album was a fucking album its one of those records that you have to play as a record. you cant just cherry pick songs off it. the sum is far greater than all the parts on this album. amazing record to put on while doing homework/going to sleep.



when Noel tries to sing the song without Liam the whole thing falls flat without Liam's grit. the album vocal tracks are that good.

[youtube][/youtube]

i think im going to drive down the street blasting the shit out of this

[youtube][/youtube]

Gavin wrote:

Concretebadger wrote:The same thing happened with the Strokes though, didn't it? Seemingly every sodding week during the early to mid 2000s, a NY-style 'garage rock' Strokes soundalike band with lazy vocals (with a different accent this time), bed hair, a name that worked on the "The [something]s" formula and in-one-ear-and-out-the-other riffs were championed by NME as the Next Big Thing. The press always latches on to whatever happens to be big at the time, and that's what happened with Oasis in the 90s. There was nothing wrong with one band sounding like Oasis; there's a lot wrong with a dozen bands trying to sound like them.

George wrote:the libertines were more responsible for that, but yeah it dominated local scenes for a long time

Yeah and no, imo. I thought of the Libertines as just another Strokes ripoff, but I suppose they maybe went on to create tons of Libertines ripoffs of their own. Ultimately I think it was the Strokes fault. I still really like that first Strokes album though.

yeah i can listen to the strokes still, hardly ever spin the libertines. i dunno, but imo, tit for tat, the libertines had far more of an influence on the wave of gobby indy uk bands than the strokes, musically at least, and i would also say culturally. in fact musically i dont see the libertines having that much of a direct influence from the strokes at all

I don't think the 'garage rock revival' had influence over much at all, which was the problem I had with it. The songwriting, the guitar sounds/techniques/equipment...not even the politics of the members themselves were in any way interesting or inspiring. It was jangly droning mediocrity and there was so much of it. The Strokes were okay but I guess I just got saturated with this wave of dull music that all sounded the same.

Back on-topic Re: Oasis. Many of their best tracks were b-sides. The Masterplan is a much more enjoyable record than Be Here Now for instance.

George wrote:the libertines were more responsible for that, but yeah it dominated local scenes for a long time

I think it was Strokes who was responsible for the whole genre with bed hair and worn leather jackets. After they released EP and album, NME created using them the stage for "The Bands" and started to seek British equivalent for Strokes. So, they found Doherty and Barat who were writting odd songs that weren't brit-pop and who couldn't find audience for their songs
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]

sunshiner wrote: [youtube][/youtube]

you guys listened to this hot garbage ?

So glad they never got big here in the US. either that or i was too busy listening to get up kids and the anniversary in 1999 to give tae fuck.



listen, if you start singing about whiskey 30 seconds into your song ill give you the benefit of the doubt 100% of the time but by 42 seconds in i shut that fucker down.

maybe this shit came out after the get up kids? my emo days were from like 1999-2003. then everything went to fucking shit

every band that came out in 2004 had "THE" in thier name or "black, fire, dead, or death" in thier name. i boycotted every single one of those fucking bands based on principle. if you are to fucking lazy to spend more than 3 minutes coming up with an original band name your music is going to be just as lazy.

oasis are shit

my wife used to love BANDS

like new bands. now all she likes is fucking Pitbull and Ke$ha.


it makes me really really sad from a spouse standpoint, because trying to find new bands that play drums, guitar, bass, and sing is still a huge part of my life.

she could really give 2 fucks about any of it now and makes me turn down every single fucking thing im trying to listen to in the car.



I try to play records for my kids every morning while they are eating breakfast and it stresses her out completely. she says it doesn't but she acts completely different. WHY DO YOU HAVE TO PLAY IT SO LOUD? because the record player is in the dining room and they are eating in the kitchen thats why and you arent fucking 67 fucking years old either why do you give a shit?

robroe wrote:my wife used to love BANDS

like new bands. now all she likes is fucking Pitbull and Ke$ha.


it makes me really really sad from a spouse standpoint, because trying to find new bands that play drums, guitar, bass, and sing is still a huge part of my life.

she could really give 2 fucks about any of it now and makes me turn down every single fucking thing im trying to listen to in the car.



I try to play records for my kids every morning while they are eating breakfast and it stresses her out completely. she says it doesn't but she acts completely different. WHY DO YOU HAVE TO PLAY IT SO LOUD? because the record player is in the dining room and they are eating in the kitchen thats why and you arent fucking 67 fucking years old either why do you give a shit?