I'm glad someone is speaking sense.light rail coyote wrote:bubbles_horwitz wrote: different guitars are better suited to different strings, but what it really comes down to is what the player prefers.
no you are wrong and ignorant. you may "THINK" you prefer .09's on your guitar, but .11 are shortscale's true destined strings. you may beleive .09's are better, but that's only because you haven't tried hard enough to find the truth. havent you read the 10 commandments of string gauge usage. it's written in fucking stone dude
Tell Me About Mustang Tremolo
Moderated By: mods
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
- dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1022402
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
i think people are just playing to the averages here. and for the most part, heavier gauge strings are "better" suited to shorter scales. there are physical and mechanical reasons for this. . . fender put 11's on my av jag, and i think they know something about their guitars. of course how you play and how it feels to you are going to play a part; srv rocked 13's on strats. but i don't think there's anything wrong in telling somebody "this is how it's usually done" or "how it was designed" when they ask.bubbles_horwitz wrote:yes, i realize that. my point is that string gauge won't make or break a guitar. a mustang isn't gonna suck with 10's and then be magically delicious with 11's. unless you happen to prefer 11's. in which case, any guitar will feel better with them.dots wrote:i don't believe it has to have anything to do with how somebody "wants it to be" though. the fact is, if changing the diameter of the strings by infinitesimal amounts causes everything from neck bowing to intonation to saddle fit issues, obviously there's much more to the equation than "feel." that's not to say that how a guitarist likes the touch and tension to his/her fingers isn't important, but clearly you recognize that changing string gauge has many more implications than that, right?bubbles_horwitz wrote:say for 10's we have a diameter of 10 thousandths of an inch (on the high e string), while with 11's we have a diameter of 11 thousandths of an inch. the difference in mass per inch isn't very big (i know diameter isn't mass, but the effect .001" change in diameter will have on the mass is insignificant). the difference is more noticeable on the lower strings, but it's not nearly as much as you seem to want it to be.
right now i've got both my 22.5" musicmaster and my 24" jaguar strung up with 9's. there's no flopping going on. i have no tuning or buzzing issues. 'cause i set them up not to do that. i've tried lots of different strings on both of these guitars. even d'addario chromes, robroe style. and still, i always find myself back with 9's. it's what i like, and it works for me. which is my point. different guitars are better suited to different strings, but what it really comes down to is what the player prefers.
- BobArsecake
- a mannequin made by madmen
- Posts: 10957
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)
- dots
- BADmin (he/him)
- Posts: 1022402
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
- Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
- Contact:
very odd indeed. AND, not only did my avri jag come with 11's on it, but they were flatwound AND included a pack of specially made jaguar strings that i have not been able to find anywhere else since. they're basically a pack of fender's flatwound 11's with the G left unwound. still seeing if i can find them. . .
- BobArsecake
- a mannequin made by madmen
- Posts: 10957
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)
- BobArsecake
- a mannequin made by madmen
- Posts: 10957
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:40 am
- Location: Leeds (LeedsLeeds)
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- light rail coyote
- .
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Rena, Norway
- Contact:
when are you going to be illuminated to the great everpresent truth of the word of string gauge correctness. It's in stone dude, fucking stone. 11's on shortscale. you just need to look harder for the truth. end your ignorancedodgedartdave wrote:No. Jaguar strings are a thicker gauge that are needed on short scale guitars. I can't imagine how thick the strings are on Mandocasters!Sublimedo wrote:my Elvis Jazzy came with an extra set of whats called "Jaguar/Jazzmaster" strings. are these the same thing?
Fuzz monkeys are generally fed the most bananas
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- light rail coyote
- .
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Rena, Norway
- Contact:
-
- .
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:12 pm
- light rail coyote
- .
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Rena, Norway
- Contact:
lush vocabulary, mot. I actually put 12s with the wound G on most of my shortscales. But the pack that came with jazzy actually had "Jaguar/Jazzmaster strings" printed on the set, which is rather odd with the difference in scale 'n shiet.light rail coyote wrote:when are you going to be illuminated to the great everpresent truth of the word of string gauge correctness. It's in stone dude, fucking stone. 11's on shortscale. you just need to look harder for the truth. end your ignorancedodgedartdave wrote:No. Jaguar strings are a thicker gauge that are needed on short scale guitars. I can't imagine how thick the strings are on Mandocasters!Sublimedo wrote:my Elvis Jazzy came with an extra set of whats called "Jaguar/Jazzmaster" strings. are these the same thing?