Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:11 pm
It's more about clean headroom than volume.
Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:59 pm
Why are any of you bothering? Some guys like to have a Harley and pretend they actually ride it. Icey likes to have the hair-metal stereotype going on, and pretend he can mix it with the likes of Vai or Rhoads.
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:53 pm
Me too. I've got the same combo.DeadPenny wrote:as do i. my JB/Jazz combo is just snazzy.
Oh shit, double post. alert.
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:01 pm
I agree. I use my valveking with a booster to punch the preamp with some power cos I can't crank it in my basement. I can get it up to 4 or 5 mind you though. But, the clean headroom is much nicer with the 100 watt then the 50 watt combos. I hate it when my clean tone isn't pristine and shimmering but thats just me.Doog wrote:It's more about clean headroom than volume.
I have the jazz/jb combo in my sg right now but I'm thinking of changing the jb out for a duncan distortion cos the jb has a total lack of bass...its all treble and mids.
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:49 pm
If Duncan's are so horrible and DImarzio's are obviously the superior pickup, why does Larry Dimarzio and his team of lawyers feel the need to trademark the double cream configuration on their humbuckers?
Gibson made the first double cream 'buckers, but they felt no need to trademark a COLOR. Larry Dimarzio trademarked a color configuration that he didn't come up with.
Please clarify, who's the scumbag again?
Gibson made the first double cream 'buckers, but they felt no need to trademark a COLOR. Larry Dimarzio trademarked a color configuration that he didn't come up with.
Please clarify, who's the scumbag again?
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:04 pm
I like the way this guy thinks. Welcome to the boards. You are my new best friend.Benjy_26 wrote:If Duncan's are so horrible and DImarzio's are obviously the superior pickup, why does Larry Dimarzio and his team of lawyers feel the need to trademark the double cream configuration on their humbuckers?
Gibson made the first double cream 'buckers, but they felt no need to trademark a COLOR. Larry Dimarzio trademarked a color configuration that he didn't come up with.
Please clarify, who's the scumbag again?
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:08 pm
Thank you. I agree about the Antigua too. 
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:11 pm
And you would be 100% correct. Agreeing with me is often a good idea.Benjy_26 wrote:Thank you. I agree about the Antigua too.
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:26 pm
i think iCY ended this thread when he called hi pickup a "witch assasin"
or something to that effect.
what an awesome name for a shitty joke garage band.
WITCH ASSASIN !!!!! opening up for LAYZERBLADE
or something to that effect.
what an awesome name for a shitty joke garage band.
WITCH ASSASIN !!!!! opening up for LAYZERBLADE
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:59 pm
What does that have to do with sonding kool?Benjy_26 wrote:If Duncan's are so horrible and DImarzio's are obviously the superior pickup, why does Larry Dimarzio and his team of lawyers feel the need to trademark the double cream configuration on their humbuckers?
Gibson made the first double cream 'buckers, but they felt no need to trademark a COLOR. Larry Dimarzio trademarked a color configuration that he didn't come up with.
Please clarify, who's the scumbag again?
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:02 pm
buy a jazzmaster pickup, we all know they are the best sounding pickups ever made