Page 31 of 225
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:49 am
by euan
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:56 pm
by Hurb
ok this is tidier right?
managed to fit the plugs on(yes there is a lot isn't there) still haven't screwed out down or tidied the wires up. i think i wanna get black George l's cable as the red sucks to look at...yes i know.
were the fook is all the pedals i want gonna fit now

Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:00 pm
by Thom
Looks sweet Hurb, real neat and tidy
See you got your momentary switch for your RC-2, looks cool in red too. How you liking it?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:06 pm
by Hurb
yeah much better to have the extra switch. i would say that the rc-2 without it is a great at home looper. but with the extra switch it makes it better for live use.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:11 pm
by Thom
Hurb wrote:yeah much better to have the extra switch. i would say that the rc-2 without it is a great at home looper. but with the extra switch it makes it better for live use.
Well said.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:23 pm
by kim
Chico Malo wrote:
nice stuff !
is that the stanley clarke signature on the left ? ..nice.
hurb, i was wondering.. what kind of george l cable do you use for your patch cables; 0.225 or 0.115 ? i heard things about differences in sound between the thinner (more flexible) cable and the thicker one. .. ?
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:28 pm
by Hurb
0.115 I believe.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:40 pm
by James
Indeed.
I doubt they actually sound different, I imagine it's purely practical convenience that there are two sizes.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 9:52 pm
by Chico Malo
heavium ~ thanks! yes, it is the s.c.
i also use the thinner george l cables on my pedalboard.
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:29 am
by Mike
I use the thin ones because the thick ones are stupid. I actually like the red on my board, yours is looking niiiice Hurbster!

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 1:31 pm
by Chico Malo
Agreed, the thicker ones are stupid.
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:41 pm
by Tweez
Latest addition, homebuilt Bypass/Feedback Loop. It needs a clearcoat or something to be totally finished.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:57 pm
by kim
just received this :
nice stuff, warbles with extreme settings but i'm liking it
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:04 pm
by Hurb
Nice!! i was thinking about getting an oc3 but its big dolla for summit i wont use a great deal(or will I ?)
samples please Kim!
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:06 pm
by Mike
haha cute picture
I had one of dem, it's the only piece of gear I ever owned that is unaccounted for - I have no idea where that pedal is. I liked it though.
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:24 pm
by kim
i can imagine using it on bass for higher region melodic stuff (yes.. the terrible 12th fret region !

) with some dirt on top of it, i have an octaver on my ashdown bass head but it's way too subtle plus it ain't footswitcheable but it's because of that feature that i really wanted an octaver to fatten up certain parts.
i'm afraid i'm gonna have to leave out the red repeat on my bass board tho.. i only use it once during a set (the intro) but it's not really a must so it will get a spot on my guitar board (i'm using the ehx softcase as my pedalboard for guitar, it has the pedals that have been dumped for bass use..hehe)
but yeah.. tomorrow i've nothing to do so i'll try to record some random stuff.
btw, i'm in the market for a replacement phaser for the pepperoni one.. preferably under €100 and tiny..
also.. i've been thinking about replacing the chorus with a reverb pedal... i'm starting to hate chorus

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:15 pm
by Doog
Cool, octavers are fun-o. Putting it before your dirt source (start of chain ideally) and using the neck pup gives the best results

Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:46 pm
by ElCapitan
Small Stone
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:31 pm
by kim
nano ?
over mxr ?
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:42 pm
by euan
Nano is cheaper I guess. I like the sound of the MXR after a Whammy at -1octave though.