Page 1 of 1

Recording Methods Thread.

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:07 pm
by Ian
Post your best tricks and secrets, or just how you go about recording.

GO!

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:04 pm
by Sloan
turn that shit up

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:19 pm
by Doog
Fix it in the mix.

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:23 pm
by gaybear
kick drums, put 1 mic in the usual spot, and another inside the shell, facing the wood.

listen to "pull me from the floor" here http://www.myspace.com/thepinwheels

big bassy sound w/o too much ringing.

recorded by Al

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:28 pm
by Sloan
Doog wrote:Fix it in the mix.
hly sht. :lol:

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:55 pm
by James
I dont even know where to begin in a thread like this.

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:56 pm
by aen
FUcking do it right the first time, put up a room mic for christ's sake.

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:06 pm
by kim
less is more.

basic drumkit ?

you don't need more than three or four mics, max !

we're about to record a diy demo with lustrous (got a bunch of recording equipment) and our drummer wants tons and tons of mics for his kit, close-mic'd drums sound lame, let that kit breathe.

i can't give any other tips because i'm just a noob when it comes to diy recording, obviously.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:28 am
by gaybear
i like the 2 on the kick as mentioned. otherwise, one between snare and high hat, and two overheads. if getting fancy, a mic behind the drummer about 5 feet, and an under snare could be alright. i don't like triggering drums.

guitar, i like one on the speaker, and one a couple feet back.

on bass, one mic, and one direct line in.

on vocals, i just stick my dick in their mouth.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:05 am
by Mike
Worst thread ever.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:19 pm
by More Cowbell
A good recording is shit without a Good performance. The players make the recordings. Look at some of the old 50's shit when everything was recorded at the same time. Talent.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:12 pm
by kim
yeah, it's def a plus if you can record everything at the same time, way more spontaneous, more energy and all that..

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 6:05 pm
by gaybear
Mike wrote:Worst thread ever.
well, improve it then!

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:27 pm
by James
heavium wrote:yeah, it's def a plus if you can record everything at the same time, way more spontaneous, more energy and all that..
Whilst Id say that that's true most of the time, I think there are definitely times when it's better not to.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:30 pm
by More Cowbell
heavium wrote:yeah, it's def a plus if you can record everything at the same time, way more spontaneous, more energy and all that..
I meant more of the "take" or performance of the musician, but playing together live can rawk hard too.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:53 pm
by kim
yeah i know what you meant tho, back then all musicians were Musicians

fact. :mrgreen:

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:02 pm
by James
What about guys like Elvis? Front man pretty boys, they had those then too.

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 8:44 pm
by More Cowbell
ELVIS>THE BEATLES

Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 9:17 pm
by Mike
gaybear wrote:
Mike wrote:Worst thread ever.
well, improve it then!
it's too open ended, if Ian had put even a gnat's ass of effort into the original post I might have played ball but I'm not arsed.