Should I buy this (JCM800 content)

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Should I buy this (JCM800 content)

Post by James »

Ok so Ive decided to spend some cash on gear. I went to the only guitar shop in town that does second stuff on the off chance they had anything before splashing the cash on ebay. And it turns out they had a 50w JCM800, with basic settings. Which is exactly what I want. Thing is, it's not in normal case at all. Its chunkier and narrower. I took a couple of pics on my phone but they came out a bit shite. The knobs are black and massive too. On the back it says its a 2205 model.

10 points for guessing what the pedal is on top of the amp, and 50 points for guessing how much I paid for it (with a £5 margin of error allowed).

Image

Image

The marshall is £350, he wouldnt go any lower on it. It doesnt have a standby switch which I thought odd, just an on/off switch on the left. On the right it has vertical high/low inputs (though i doubt vertical matters for this) and the pots control (l-r)

presence
bass
mid
treble
master vol
pre gain

When I left he locked up, and I'm at work when they open tomorrow. I was thinking about just calling 5 minutes after they open to say I'll get it, and go by after work and pick it up. Is this wise? It's basically what I want in an amp, and a very decent price, I've just never seen one like this anywhere online.

I shouldve probably said I'll give you x for the amp and pedal, but I was defo buying the pedal and not sure about the amp. Didnt wanna go back and the pedal be gone. That little bastard is right filthy.
Shabba.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

That case is weird. Its like someone has hacked a rack case to make it. Does it sound good? If so buy it. But ask Mike, he is Mr Marshall.

Zoom Ultrafuzz?
Last edited by euan on Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
euan
User avatar
SickenedEmotions99
.
.
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:54 pm
Location: Sparkill, NY
Contact:

Post by SickenedEmotions99 »

Zoom Ultra Fuzz?
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

It is quite rack sized actually.

And aye, the ultra fuzz.

They had the "tri-metal" from the same series for the same price, i didnt try it out cos it was so nearly closing, but I might give it a go when I have time.
Shabba.
User avatar
ekwatts
A series of tubes
Posts: 24579
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Bongchester

Post by ekwatts »

Could it have been rehoused? Even so, that looks like a professional job to me, and if it's what you want and sounds right, then I say go for it.
Image
Brandon W wrote:you elites.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

euan wrote:That case is weird. Its like someone has hacked a rack case to make it. Does it sound good? If so buy it. But ask Mike, he is Mr Marshall.

Zoom Ultrafuzz?
I didnt play with the settings too much, but I couldnt really get proper dirt at reasonable volumes. But it has shite loads of power behind it. It can do "warm" very well. And (good news gary) had shite loads of bass. I plan on using dirt anyway, I have 3 nice dirt pedals at the mo (rat2, ultra fuzz and sansamp) and plan on getting at least one from pen pen, so really it should work out alright. I'm just a bit worried that it doesnt look like normal and the lack of standby.

To be honest, the look is alright, I was thinking about getting something like a Matamp so itd be smaller and i could do the vertical 2x12 thing if i wanted. I just dont wanna fuck up spending 350 on something only to find out its not worth that at all. Paranoid I guess.
Shabba.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

I don't know. Talk to Mike, he knows more about Marshalls and shit. As far as I was aware the entire JCM800 series should have more than 6 knobs.
Image
euan
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Image

Its the same knob setup as that, but with a different panel. 6 knobs isnt dodgy, lack of standby and the general look is. Maybe theyt did make a rack version.
Shabba.
User avatar
euan
partynerd!
Posts: 27589
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: People's Republic of Irnbruikstan

Post by euan »

I did a search for the 2205 and all I could find was the 11 knob or something version.
Image
euan
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Thats the split channel version.

Heres another with different grill. If it looked like this I'd have it home already.

Image
Shabba.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

2205 is split channel version - that can't be what you played today... 2204 is the 50W version of the 6 knobs 2203:

http://www.drtube.com/marshall.htm#JCM800

I would steer clear personally

1) Rehoused in a casing like that the tubes have less space to breathe and there is no grill on the top to allow heat to dissipate - at the least your tubes will run hot and not last as long - at worse it will melt solder joints onto the sockets and/or rest of the tagboard.

2) you should have been able to get some crunch out of it with max pre amp and low master - did that not happen?

3) no standby switch is bad - tubes need them for protection from voltage jumps on switch on - it will wear out (expensive) power tubes.

What outputs were on it? Impedance selector? How many speaker outs?

Was there an effects loop added?

I would say well done on the pedal and call it quits - modded shit like that you'll get no hell from Marshall service or any tech on - if it dies you're fucked. Even though that price is alright it doesn't sound kosher - you should have been able to get some crunch.

That last pic you posted is a regular jCM800, they sometimes age like that.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Like I said on MSN, it doesn't look like any JCM800 I've seen. I've be a little suspicious until someone finds a model name and picture online.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

I know the model number - 2204 is the layout and wattage he's talking about.

teh 2205 on the backplate doesn't match and is probably just written on. It could be ANYTHING inside the box.

Jog on - it's a bad buy.
User avatar
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London

Post by Doog »

Under the JCM800 "regime", the model numbering was changed. The heads retained their original model numbers, but the combo's were given model numbers in the 4000 range.

The solid state and hybrid heads were given model numbers in the 3000 range and the solid state combo's were given model numbers in the 5000 range. In some schematics the 4103 & 4104 combo's are still referenced as 2103 & 2104.


Never knew there was any hybrid/SS stuff in the 800 range.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

There's a few models that are really unpublicised as they were.. shit frankly.

I think it must be one of those solid state fuckers tarted to look like a 2205 but he fucked up and chose the wrong model number. Shady.

Could you even see tubes in it?
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

It has a small slider switch on the back to go between 8 and 16 ohms. Horizontal switch. To the left of that it had speaker outs A and B.

I dont remember it having vents on top, and the back was sealed too I think. All sounds like bad news for tubes.

I defo got crunch, but I couldnt get anything like filth. It did sound like as you pushed the master up it would get there, but it would be at very loud volume. This was with the pre all the way up too.

I'm sure it said 2205 on the back, but the back panel looked different to the standard marshall one with the black sticker like bit. I might go by again and ask to look inside, and take better pics.
Shabba.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

Don't even bother mate. It's shady as fuck - don't throw your money away. The fact there is no ventilation is fucked up, the model number doesn't match and the fact there is no standby is a bad sign either way (SolidState or bad for tubes). Seriously I would pay literally nothing for that bag of worms.

I know you're excited but this one is not for you. If you got a real Marshall 800 I personally could pull it apart and fix it for you, this thing? Forgetaboutit
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Ultra fuzz was 39 bucks btw. Tied with the rat for best value first pedal evar.

I'll leave the amp then. I plan on getting one soon, but I wanna get one I wanna keep. This did sound good, but I can wait it out.
Shabba.
User avatar
Mike
I like EL34s
Posts: 39170
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by Mike »

YOu got a great deal on a deleted pedal. Nice.

You walked out of this up. All good.
User avatar
James
Nutmeg
Posts: 10645
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:15 pm
Location: Boxingham Palace

Post by James »

Cheers Mike. The Ultra Fuzz is rocking, I think I might sell the sansamp. Not because I dislike it, just because its worth more than the rat and ultra fuzz combined and it means I can afford to spend a bit more on an amp and that.
Shabba.