I used to think Elderly was them cools.
Moderated By: mods
I used to think Elderly was them cools.
THEN IS SAW THIS.
http://elderly.com/vintage/items/30U-14659.htm
Very Good Condition?
WHAT THE FUCK NO WAY. GET THE COCKS OUT OF YOUR EYES ELDERLY. FOR FUCKSSAKE.
http://elderly.com/vintage/items/30U-14659.htm
Very Good Condition?
WHAT THE FUCK NO WAY. GET THE COCKS OUT OF YOUR EYES ELDERLY. FOR FUCKSSAKE.
- holyCATS1415
- .
- Posts: 1063
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:18 pm
- Location: MQT, MI
- Contact:
- Ninja Mike 808
- .
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:06 pm
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
- robert(original)
- .
- Posts: 7174
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:30 pm
- Location: somewhere in the midwest
- analogsystem
- .
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:02 pm
- Location: Seattle
I've read the explanations of your condition descriptions, and I'm completely baffled as to how this warrants a 'VGC'. The neck having been broken at both the headstock and the body end and the paint being covered in scratches, scraps and even just completely missing in places. Even the pickguard is cracked. The nly explanation I can think of is VGC is an abbreaviation for something other than 'Very Good Condition'. Perhaps there was an admin/copy paste error when listing the guitar?
James.
That's from (or at least from the account of) Anthony Marsala who says he is the General Manager at Elderly.Hi James,
Thanks for the email. The "as-is" stuff has always been problematic for us. When we rate them like we do the other stuff, it all ends up in poor condition and languishes. What we have done is rate it like all the repairs were done. That's why we say "except for..." and list the needed repairs. Rating is subjective and that is why we disclose as much as possible in the written description itself and include detailed photos.
Thanks,
Tony
Last edited by James on Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Shabba.
What kind of nonsense is this? What's the point of providing a rating on a guitar's condition, if the rating is based on a possible future condition, as opposed to the actual, current condition?Tony wrote:What we have done is rate it like all the repairs were done.
I should start giving reports like this about the patients to the doctors at work...
"His red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit are within normal range, but we're going to have to give him a transfusion because he's completely bled out"
or
"His heart is functioning perfectly and we're going to have to call the code team because it's not beating anymore"
You make a good point, however your examples don't really.... mmm how do I say these....astro wrote:What kind of nonsense is this? What's the point of providing a rating on a guitar's condition, if the rating is based on a possible future condition, as opposed to the actual, current condition?Tony wrote:What we have done is rate it like all the repairs were done.
I should start giving reports like this about the patients to the doctors at work...
"His red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit are within normal range, but we're going to have to give him a transfusion because he's completely bled out"
or
"His heart is functioning perfectly and we're going to have to call the code team because it's not beating anymore"