Page 1 of 1

Mmmmm.... PG-13. May be NSFW @ some places.

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:23 am
by tribi9
I do like the listing, but I do think is wrong to sell these...

"Back" plate

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:37 am
by Ninja Mike 808
Yea, wrong to sell, but that is the best way to sell I have ever seen!

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:01 am
by Will
To think - they paid $.15 each to list all those pictures...

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:36 am
by James
DuoSonicBoy wrote:To think - they paid $.15 each to list all those pictures...
You only pay like that if you add them using the ebay way of adding them. Linking via html to offsite pictures (ie photobucket) doesnt cost anything and is by far the best way of doing it. Unless you're like this knobhead and use it for this sort of nonsense.

Posted: Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:52 pm
by Justin J
classy.

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:46 am
by markocaster
All this guys listings allways have the saucy pics. It does seem alittle fishy selling those plates so any schmo can make a guitar a "custom shop" :roll:

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:25 am
by boyecho
markocaster wrote:All this guys listings allways have the saucy pics. It does seem alittle fishy selling those plates so any schmo can make a guitar a "custom shop" :roll:
no, the worst part is including a certificate of authenticity... i bet he found himself a loophole, but from a buyers point of view, i can see how 110 for a neckplate and a piece of paper can proove fruitful in creating fake customshop fenders.

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 3:26 am
by Tex-czech
8th picture down, what a behind.

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:20 am
by Sloan
YA CAN'T SELL GUITAR PARTS IF THERE'S NO NAKEDNESS!!!

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:56 pm
by turtle
Sloan wrote:YA CAN'T SELL GUITAR PARTS IF THERE'S NO NAKEDNESS!!!
well she's not naked, but would this qualify?

Image

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 4:16 pm
by Sloan
A+++ WOULD LOL AGAIN