Page 1 of 1
moving on to thicker strings
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:26 am
by Skip
i am going to put 11's on my jagmaster when it comes in
i think it comes with 10's
do i have to make any adjustments or just tune her up and play?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:28 am
by Haze
string height to your preferance, maybe intonation, then
![bravo ~(bravo)](./images/smilies/PDT_Armataz_01_37.gif)
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:47 am
by brambleperro
If you're buying it new, it will likely come with 9's. I'm pretty sure that's what Fender puts on them, and most guitar stores string them up that way.
Regardless, you should be fine. I put 13's on mine recently, and I've had no problems at all with it.
EDIT: I just read your other post about trading your g-dec for it. Forget what I said about the factory strings.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:26 am
by Skip
bramble--- it is still new from a internet store---- they just take trades
thanks for the info
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:28 am
by brambleperro
No problem. Have fun with the Jagmaster. It's a great guitar for the price period.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:34 am
by Will
Truss rod maybe - I've seen a lot of new guitars that come with the truss rod totally loose. Tightening it isn't usually difficult. Google instructions and remember: NEVER FORCE IT.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:42 am
by More Cowbell
Play it first. Then Change strings. Then post here about any problems such as buzzing, Notes going sharp, etc.
Don't fix it if ain't broke. Just put them strangs on and give it a go.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:32 pm
by robert(original)
so is this like the 3rd thread you have made about the same guitar>?
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:53 pm
by Skip
yes robert (original)
and...................
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:55 pm
by jamieb
Surely going up from 09s to 10s will yank the bridge up
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
- would you not have to adjust the trem springs?
That's a genuine question, not smart arse rhetoric.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:01 pm
by robert(original)
maybe not, it all depends on how its setup with 9's
the "correct" way to set up a strat trem is to have 2-3 mms of lift on the back end of the bridge so its in a sort of "floating like" state.
alot of the time people just crank down till it hits the body tho.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:03 pm
by robroe
haha i remember the first time i put 13's on my supersonic after i got it.
it was my first experience with a strat bridge....i was like WTF IS GOING ON WHY IS IT COMING OUT OF THE GUITAR?????
hahah
just put 5 springs on it and it will be fine forever
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:04 pm
by jamieb
robert(original) wrote:maybe not, it all depends on how its setup with 9's
the "correct" way to set up a strat trem is to have 2-3 mms of lift on the back end of the bridge so its in a sort of "floating like" state.
alot of the time people just crank down till it hits the body tho.
Yeah well, interesting you say that. When i changed 9s for 10s on my strat initially it yanked the bridge up at an odd angle which i corrected by screwing the claw uh screws in further (is this the right way to solve it?) so it was back to floating in the manner you say. However, im currently wanting to replace the 9s on my Jag with 11s and was wondering if I would need the neck adjusted to compensate and whether, again, I would have to adjust the tension of the trem springs.
Any help appreciated!
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:05 pm
by Hurb
Skip wrote:yes robert (original)
and...................
Keep it in one thread or I'm gonna delete the whole fuckin lot.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:06 pm
by robert(original)
you'll need to tighten up the screw in the trem plate a bit, the neck may not need the ajustment, i know with my american, i got it with 9's and when i put 11's on it the neck stayed exactly the same.
power of good flat sawn maple i suppose.
but once i moved up to 12's i did tweak the neck a bit, but not by much at all.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:21 pm
by laterallateral
jamieb wrote:I would have to adjust the tension of the trem springs.
I think that by "Jag" Jamieb meant the Jagmaster.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:23 pm
by robert(original)
oh well shit, that was right over my head.
its the same bridge, treat it that way.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:30 pm
by jamieb
robert(original) wrote:oh well shit, that was right over my head.
its the same bridge, treat it that way.
Haha oops, no, you were right the first time dude I indeed was talking about a Jaguar not Jagmaster - sorry should have been more clear!
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:33 pm
by robert(original)
oh ok cool.
i used to talk about my jag-stang and i would call it a jag, up until i got a jag, then it was the j.s.