Page 1 of 1

Robert(original) Duo-Sonic II Demo Video

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:17 pm
by Mike
[youtube][/youtube]

BAM.

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:36 pm
by ultraviolence
sounds pretty good, but the video doesn't seem as good quality as your mustang demo?

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:42 pm
by Mike
The video quality changes for some reason, my camera is a POS. The audio is the same though, SM57 close mic'd audio.

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:48 pm
by Hurb
FUCKIN YEAH! I know how much you wanted this project done mike. And your glee is amazing.
Mustang/duosonic the new mike guitar! fuck some tele's

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:50 pm
by Mike
Hurb wrote:Mustang/duosonic the new mike guitar! fuck some tele's
It's the future.

Watch this space but the Telecaster is very, very annoyed at me at the moment. First I sell it's friend and now it's flanked by two shortscales.

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:57 pm
by stewart
ah, you can't beat an ash body for a bit of neck beef. or you can, probably, but it still sounds top hole!

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:04 pm
by Reece
Some viscious twang there.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:29 am
by astro
Sounds immense!

What kind of pickups did you stick in there?

How cool would it have been if Fender/Squier would have put out a Duo 2 with these features instead of the faux 50's one they released?

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 8:57 am
by Mike
They were just CIJ '69 pickups I bought from The 'Burbz, a fellow shortscaler. I was mainly interested in them for the covers, but I like them plenty. I see no reason to change at the moment - sure they're low gain, and sure they're both fucking IDENTICAL (5.78K) because fender are knobs but they sound good to my ears, I'll know more when I play with the band next week.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:13 pm
by MaMo
astro wrote: How cool would it have been if Fender/Squier would have put out a Duo 2 with these features instead of the faux 50's one they released?
My thoughts exactly. Nothing against the classic duo, but the Duo II is far to dope to not have some sort of reissue.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:33 pm
by JamesSmann
you need to stop cussing so much.


lol

just fuckin' kidding.

i also like hearing you say things are "immense" in IRL. it makes me realize you post like you talk, ng.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:45 pm
by astro
Mike wrote:They were just CIJ '69 pickups I bought from The 'Burbz, a fellow shortscaler. I was mainly interested in them for the covers, but I like them plenty. I see no reason to change at the moment - sure they're low gain, and sure they're both fucking IDENTICAL (5.78K) because fender are knobs but they sound good to my ears, I'll know more when I play with the band next week.
Interesting... I hated the stock pickups in my '69 RI. They weren't in there long before I swapped them out. However, I'm starting to hate the new ones I put in (Lace Sensors), so maybe I should revisit the stock pickups to verify that I wasn't just being delusional in my hate.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:52 pm
by robert(original)
that guitar looks so fucking sexy.
i love the decal placement, i think thats the best decal placement i have ever seen!
srsly! it sounds fucking b'dass.
if i ever make it accross the pond thats the 2nd guitar i want to play, the first being hurbs 69 jaggie baby so pretty.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:27 pm
by Mike
Cheers man, I was proper scared of doing the decal as I was sure I'd fuck it up, but it went ok.

it's not absolutely perfect, since today I noticed after it's dried that if you look closely you can see a couple small bubbles in the light, but I don't really mind, I think considering what a cackhanded fool I am that it came out good. Thanks so much for the body, this piece of wood is glorious.

I can't stop looking at it, or playing it, and I can't wait to crank it with the band.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:44 pm
by Doog
Most awesome, that's a thing of sexiness.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 5:44 pm
by Fran
Sounds excellent Mike, beefs up well. Love the Pixies tonez 8)

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:39 pm
by NickD
Looks and sounds great 8) You should be proud of your (and Robert's) work.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:41 pm
by TideBleach
sounds awesome and looks very well done. finish is pure epicness.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:43 pm
by robert(original)
i really didn;t do much at all, and in fact made more work for him in the long run.
a.) i didn't factor in the difference in bridge height/ pocket dept
b.) the guard was more brown tort than red tort, altho it was 5 ply which looks kinda cool from an angle.
c.) i fuct up the neck placement, there is a small bit of wood putting the neck farther from the bridge than normal, but the guard covers it up.
so all in all, mike may have been able to do a better job if he cut the thing himself, in fact, im sure that he could have done a better job.

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:03 pm
by Mike
I wouldn't know where to start. And the bridge height issue wasn't your problem, it was mine from the design perspective. I didn't think it through that a standard Mustang neck pocket wouldn't line up with a hardtail bridge. Also you couldn't just have made a more deep neckpocket anyway, we thought of that (and tried it), and what happens is that then the strings from the bridge make contact with the robroe covers unless they're flush with teh pickguard, which looks wank. We ended up putting back the wood we removed. It is cosmetically invisible as we did a careful job.

The spacers we put under the bridge work a treat and are practically invisible. You'd never know they were there unless I pointed it out. We need one more for it to be perfect but that's it.

The bit of wood in the neck pocket has never and would never be an issue, it's tiny and hidden by the scratch plate, it's a non issue.

As for the brown plate, I still have it and who knows, down the line it may get used if I change my mind or the finish of the guitar in the future. Regardless I won't sell it and I'm really happy with it, it's a fantastic piece of wood and it sounds great.