Page 1 of 2

Gibson Raw Power Series 2009:Maple LPs and SG's

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:12 am
by westtexasred

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:24 am
by astro
An all maple bodied LP would probably way a billion pounds... or at least enough to deform my spine.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:03 am
by CaptainGD
This is one of the few instances I'd much prefer a rosewood fretboard.

I think that natural SG is pretty slick, though.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:18 am
by Ty
Those are incredibly un-appealing to me, how ever slap a rosewood fret board on that blue SG and there's a possibility I would check it out. Just a slim 2/10 chance.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:22 am
by Sublimedo
april fool's photoshop illustration?

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 6:24 am
by the isaac eaton
those fret boards on gibsons is just wrong. I do like the green ones though. But those fret boards are just too weird. I love gibson but i just cant get into these.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 8:15 am
by ultratwin
Raw Power sondz more rock than Studio Mapple, but 13lbs of timber would seem to be more unappealing than a Bigsby'd Steinberger.

Nice try, Gibbs.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:10 am
by kim
gibson sg or les paul with a maple neck is so uncool...the idea sounds cool but seeing it it looks icky.

instead of that 'fenderish' touch they should focus more on fenderish colors for the bodies instead of maple necks if they really wanna attract another crowd.

dakota red sg with white pg would look so much cooler than all those gay satin ugly green and grey blue, gold things

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:20 am
by timhulio
Maple necks with light coloured dots is a fail from me too.

Fail+1

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:07 am
by Progrockabuse
they should reissue more gibson's with a pelham blue paint finishe. that colour is really nice.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:10 am
by DanHeron
Do not want. They look terrible.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:29 pm
by Mo Law-ka
i cant think of maple boarded gibsons without thinking of this:
Image


@_@

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:40 pm
by ultratwin
'Tis all context, says me.

The bound/block'd maple neck on my new Dame Jazz Special V makes complete sense(even with pearloid smudge) because of the natural finish.

Image

Image

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:49 pm
by Mo Law-ka
the way i see it is that maple 'boarded guitars can't have a colored headstock.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:56 pm
by laterallateral
Mo Rocca wrote:the way i see it is that maple 'boarded guitars can't have a colored headstock.
+1

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:57 pm
by BobArsecake
ultratwin wrote:'Tis all context, says me.

The bound/block'd maple neck on my new Dame Jazz Special V makes complete sense(even with pearloid smudge) because of the natural finish.

Image

Image
'greed.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:20 pm
by brambleperro
These are atrocious, but Gibson has done the maple neck right before.

Image

The pearl dot inlays actually look great in person, mostly because the neck is so glossy and, like ultra said, the natural body.
Also, I think the colored headstock definitely works for the Ripper, but on these new ones it's probably the worst feature.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:34 pm
by Zeezee
Yeah April fools was my first thought when i saw these elsewhere.

I think it would be better if the headstock matched the fretboard. Anyway, they don't look nice to me and gold hardware is naff.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:41 pm
by Bacchus
Those Gibsons look atrocious.

Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:53 pm
by Will
Look at how knotty the natural SG is. Nashville QC FTL.