possibly better than the dd20 i'd say, the "create your own pattern" Stuff by strumming it
and the pitch shifting delays
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:52 am
by aen
Fuck dude. I love me some delay pedals.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:00 am
by mellowlogic
Looks cool, though I don't know if I have enough self-control to be a responsible delay user.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:01 am
by Haze
i doubt it.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:34 pm
by superfuzz
Thats awesome! Im scared to see how much it is!
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:37 pm
by the isaac eaton
Its $300
pro guitar shop made it look cool, but I need to play with one IRL before i make judgements on it, seems pretty cool though. But digitech is kinda hit and miss on their stuff. I think this could be a hit though.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:44 pm
by less_cunning
[edited for clarity.]
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
by Will
SHIT. That thing has some pretty impressive features. The 100% wet reverse delay was my favorite.
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:28 pm
by finboy
very cool, but between my space station and dd20 i really couldn't justify the time bender
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:59 pm
by paul_
Very 80s, I like it. My knackered old Ibanez DML10 may have met it's match... I've been trying to find something that does all those pitch-and-time-shifting delays with more reliability.
Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:46 pm
by less_cunning
[edited for clarity.]
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:22 pm
by sp3k
better than Line6 DL-4?
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:08 am
by less_cunning
[edited for clarity.]
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:23 am
by paul_
less_cunning wrote:knackered is a nice word.
I showed this to my Mum and she said there was no way.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 2:02 am
by jimib
coooool.
that 4 strum delay is really interesting, havent seen a delay that allows the delays to not all be spaced equally after each other.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:25 am
by Mike
paul_ wrote:
less_cunning wrote:knackered is a nice word.
I showed this to my Mum and she said there was no way.
ROLF
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:46 pm
by less_cunning
[edited for clarity.]
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:59 pm
by hypermused
less_cunning wrote:i would rather have the Timebender than the Line 6. personally.
why?
I'm planning buying a DL-4 or a Timebender, and I can't decide.
I haven't tried none at the time, and I don't think I'll be able to try Timebender. Only DL-4.
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:17 pm
by less_cunning
[edited for clarity.]
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:31 pm
by hypermused
less_cunning wrote:
hypermused wrote:
less_cunning wrote:i would rather have the Timebender than the Line 6. personally.
why?
I'm planning buying a DL-4 or a Timebender, and I can't decide.
I haven't tried none at the time, and I don't think I'll be able to try Timebender. Only DL-4.
basically, i have heard that Line 6 DL-4 breaks sometimes. & other times can be "tempermental." but i am not disparaging it personally. obviously. lot's of people use the Line 6 DL-4. & have not had problemz--
just personally preference though. and also. i would like to try out some Digitech stuff. plus i do think that the Line 6 has a 16 sec looping time. while the Timebender has a 20 sec looping time. it is little things like that. i'm sure the Timebender has more features too.
plus fuck it EVERYONE HAS A LINE 6 DL-4. i am a contarian. i am alwayz gonna go for something different. something someone doesn't have. that was why initially considered getting the Nova Delay. just cuz i rarely see the Nova Delay in set-ups.
it is just little nuances. that alwayz pique my interest.
sorry for the incohernce & lack of clarity...
ahah, I get you. Everyone has DL-4. But that should be good. If it used by many, it could mean that the pedal is good.
'Here' is the same thing. I'm looking for new things also. If we have different things, our sound's gonna be different too.
Of course we can't just have something because nobody else has, and sounds like shit. Quality comes first.
no problem! thanks a lot for your answer shortscalen00b here.
