Page 1 of 2
Mustang bridge on a classic play jag?
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:35 am
by lancer88
Hey, new to the boards, hoping you guys could help me out.
For my first offset - i decided to go with a classic player jag (wanted a reissue, but the price got me) everything seems great so far, but i was wondering a couple things.
My brother has a reissue Jazz and it has a i dont even know what to call it. i guess a "rocking" or maybe a "leaning" bridge, i'm sure you know what i mean. the CP jag doesnt, it has a hard mounted TOM bridge.
SO, what i want to know is; is there a way i can get it like a reissue bridge and will a mustang bridge fit into the TOM slot?
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v108/som88/DSC_0163.jpg)
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:03 am
by purplehaze19x
Im not sure about the Mustang bridge fitting in the TOM slot
But i do know the Mustang bridge is a different radius than the TOM.
If you get a Jag, Jazzy bridge you could ajust each saddle to work with the radius of the CP neck radius.
..or Warmoth has a Mustang bridge where the 1st+2nd, and the 5th+6th saddle is ajustable, and cost about $50
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:10 am
by hotrodperlmutter
pics of the rest of the guitar. looks sexy as hell.
ah
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:33 am
by lancer88
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:44 am
by hotrodperlmutter
banging. wish i could help. i just got my first jag too. 66ri.
will be following this closely.
well
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:47 pm
by lancer88
I was talkin this over with my brother and he had a very simple answer, "why dont you just swap bridge with my mustang and try it out?" sounds like the easiest way to me
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
would anyone like pics of the process when i do it?
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:14 pm
by More Cowbell
Why do you want to do this? You will get alot more sustain with a TOM bridge, and the radius will be perfect for the neck. The new Classic Jags have a flatter neck radius much like a gibson, and if you look at the mustang bridge compaired to the tom bridge you'll see the difference and hear it too.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:18 pm
by George
Yes please, I'm looking to put a schaller roller on my 98 CIJ so would like to see this - even though it's a reverse.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:24 pm
by finboy
i thought the cp's just had the TOM dropped into the regular thimbles, the one i tried definitely rocked back and forth.
if you want to get rid of the TOM, let me know
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 4:39 pm
by George
Sweet, I wasn't sure if you could drop it straight in or not - I've heard mixed opinions. I'd like to find a roller that adjusts to a 7.25" radius and maybe anchor it in place with electrical tape or something.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:52 pm
by Mike
Not possible. I don't think the thimbles in a CP will accept a Mustang bridge.
Also I don't think you need to do this, the guitar is fantastic stock and the tremolo works perfectly with the original setup.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:16 pm
by Ty
hotrodperlmutter wrote:banging. wish i could help. i just got my first jag too. 66ri.
will be following this closely.
Mustang Bridge should be a direct drop in for you guitar. Or so I believe.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:32 pm
by Doog
I'd recommend getting a Warmoth "Modified Mustang" bridge- the adjustable action on the E, A, B and thin E strings means you can match the radius; something a standard 'Stang bridge won't let you do. I've had 'Stang, stock and this bridge in my Jazzmaster and it's definately the best out there.
But yeah, unsure about dropping a standard bridge into the CP threaded bridge cups- there may not be enough space for the standard's posts.
yea.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:39 pm
by lancer88
I'm really starting to think against this. the only reason i'd do it is for cosmetic reasons
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
, so i guess all in all not worth it. but now - a new guard? considering white or back..but who knows. I still owe $600 on this lady, then we'll spruce her up. i'd really love to get a AVRI or a japanese jag, one day...
Re: yea.
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:50 pm
by Doog
lancer88 wrote: the only reason i'd do it is for cosmetic reasons
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Baaaad move.
haha
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:51 pm
by lancer88
yea yea yea - thanks for setting me straight
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: yea.
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:50 am
by Mages
lancer88 wrote:I'm really starting to think against this. the only reason i'd do it is for cosmetic reasons
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
, so i guess all in all not worth it. but now - a new guard? considering white or back..but who knows. I still owe $600 on this lady, then we'll spruce her up. i'd really love to get a AVRI or a japanese jag, one day...
okay. well, CP jags are cool too. you don't need to "fix it" so it's more like an AVRI or MIJ jag. it's cool in it's own way.
hmmmm
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:09 am
by lancer88
Mike are you the guy i saw review the classic player Jag on youtube?...and come to think of it - i also watched the same guy review the 72 tele deluxe right before i bought mine...
Re: hmmmm
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:53 am
by Mike
lancer88 wrote:Mike are you the guy i saw review the classic player Jag on youtube?...and come to think of it - i also watched the same guy review the 72 tele deluxe right before i bought mine...
hahah Guilty, that's me.
Fender owe me so much commission it's untrue. I would leave the guitar as is, and personally I much prefer Tort on Sunburst to Black or White, but that's a taste issue.
Definitely never change the bridge for cosmetic issues, I don't find TOMs ugly at all.
Plus, if you're looking at the bridge, you ain't playing it - so you're doing it wrong.
ha
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:44 pm
by lancer88
very good point! Great videos!