Page 1 of 2
Jagstang w/ built in sustainer
Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:57 pm
by Joey
I've had this project for a while just hadn't gotten around to finishing the paint. I was wanting to paint the body black. But now I'm leaning towards Dakota Red. I made a one peice pickguard, that replaces the control plate cause I got 3 control pots. I'm thinking about adding a battery box to the rear of the guitar, just to make battery change out easier. Putting the jack on the bottom of the guitar like a Les Paul. And installing the orginal control plate. I dunno what to do?
Black handmade pickguard
Bridge pickup JB
Fernandes Neck Pickup/Sustainer
3 way Toggle Switch Bridge/Both/Neck
Tune-o-matic Bridge
Locked Tail
Volume Pot / Tone Pot / Sustain Intensity
Switch on/off Sustainer / Switch Sustain Pitch
Orginal Jagstang Neck w/ Matching Pre-CBS Headstock
Replacement Tuners
Contour Added, no belly contour.... parnoid I might go thru the stock switch cavity
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:18 am
by Joey
My other Jagstang
Electronics
Bridge Pickup EMG - 81
Neck Pickup EMG - 85
Toggle Switch - Bridge/Both/Neck
25K Volume Pot (stock cause of active pickups)
25K Push/Pull Pot (push is wired .1mf cap (stock for active pickups)/pull is wired tone bypass (wide open))
2 - 9 Volt battery, pushing the pickups to 18 volts
Body & Neck
Replacement Tuners & Shimmed neck
Tune-o-matic Bridge & Lock Tail
Custom Pickguard, forgot who made it
Shielded guard and cavity
Chrome Knobs
I slanted the bass side of the TOM bridge back towards the tail (extend the scale) for better intonation on my 52's.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:12 am
by aen
Those are both pretty sweet. Im tinkering with a sustainer project too.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:54 am
by Mike
Memories
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:28 am
by Fran
+1 for Dakota Red.
Its great to see some fellow enthusiasm for the JS and to see modified models. I would be very interested to see and hear that when its finished Joey.
Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:58 pm
by m0n0mania
I've got a sustainer on a jagmaster, with the battery box sunk in the back. The annoying thing for me though is not being able to get to the trimmer pots without removing the pickguard, tempted to just put an extra hole in the back & be done with it!
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:31 am
by Joey
hahaha... yeh your right it's a pain to adjust the pots on the circuit board, don't mention that again, I just wanna finish the dam thing.
Other then that are you happy with the sustainer?
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:32 am
by DICHOTOMY
loving the color on the second one.
i really need to branch out of my regular red or white comfort zone.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 1:36 am
by Reece
gerryhernandez wrote:loving the color on the second one.
i really need to branch out of my regular red or white comfort zone.
I hear you on that.
My guitars are:
Sunburst
Brown
Red burst
White
Desert.
I didn't intentionally go for that side of the colour spectrum but it just keeps on happenin'.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 4:51 am
by prospect
I vote for returning to your initial idea; black!
I'm excited to see the finished product either way.
I like your ideas.
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:53 pm
by ploppy
That looks really cool,
How does the EMG compare to the original humbucker?
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 8:57 pm
by Joey
prospect wrote:I vote for returning to your initial idea; black!
I'm excited to see the finished product either way.
I like your ideas.
I'm just nervous about the black pickups... black guard... black knobs... ehhh black body? Just might be too much black. I really wanted to do a bloody red/black color. And with nitrocellulose lacquer your color spectrum is really limited. Unless you buy some pigment and mix your own colors. I've got some time before I get around to this project. I'm working on a few other Mustang/Jazzmaster body build at the moment.
How does the EMG compare to the original humbucker?
Alot more power! I tried several high out put passive pickups but was never happy with them. So active pickups were the next step. I like the pickups with my amp lead channel. I've got the 81 & 85... 81 great for metal riffs, sterile/weak for clean stuff. The 85 is good for clean stuff, not as good for metal riffs, but I still use it alot.
I wouldn't of put in EMG's if I owned just one guitar. If I wanna rock out, I grab this guitar. If I wanna chill, I grab different guitar. I like to have guitars that do one thing really great, rather then "ok all around". You can check out these pickups at Guitar Center, EMG are stock in alot of "heavy metal" guitars now a days.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:25 pm
by ploppy
What's the main differences between active and passive pickups then?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:26 pm
by Noirie.
Heard of google?
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:29 pm
by paul_
Good point, Google may very well lead him to a guitar discussion website where he can learn useful information on the matter.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:09 pm
by ploppy
Noirie. wrote:Heard of google?
Yes thanks!
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:22 pm
by Mages
passive means it's not powered. active means it's powered. active pickups have a pre-amp built in that boost the output level.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:27 pm
by ploppy
mage wrote:passive means it's not powered. active means it's powered. active pickups have a pre-amp built in that boost the output level.
Cheers Mage.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:23 pm
by Joey
Yeh, active pickups require a power source. Most people use one 9 volt battery with their EMG's. I put in 2 - 9 volt battery to push the pickups. They are rated for 27 volts... but there isn't much difference in tone 18 volts vs 27 volts.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:05 pm
by Bacchus
Joey wrote:Yeh, active pickups require a power source. Most people use one 9 volt battery with their EMG's. I put in 2 - 9 volt battery to push the pickups. They are rated for 27 volts... but there isn't much difference in tone 18 volts vs 27 volts.
I still want a guitar with a petrol generator to power crazy hot pickups.