Fender Jaguar Transitions etc
Moderated By: mods
right, i'd do that too. cuz you PAID lotsa $ for yours - she's a beauty, btw congrats!Mike wrote:Shame about the pickups but the sound is what matters I guess?
I'm sort of itching to get into mine to be honest, I sort of want to see the grey bottomed pickups for myself before I'll be satisfied it's all original as it was sold. They'll be hell to pay if it isn't.
long story short, i'd gotten the marshall head about 6 years ago for around $70. add cap job and back panel etc. i had about $200 in it. the cab around $200 too.
so with or without original pups, $400 for one of the last jags, with original case --- i think i did great!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Pat.
my name is Pat.
sound is ALL that matters. If it sounds good it IS good!Mike wrote:Shame about the pickups but the sound is what matters I guess?
I'm sort of itching to get into mine to be honest, I sort of want to see the grey bottomed pickups for myself before I'll be satisfied it's all original as it was sold. They'll be hell to pay if it isn't.
as for getting into the pickguard, I'd be scared as hell. I see people disecting vintage guitars, removing the neck, opening up the PG, changing stuff...that's all fine and good on a new guitar but that Jag is a piece of HISTORY man! Just my 2 cents.
aen wrote:hotrodperlmutter wrote:being butt fucked by a lion is better than the stock [CIJ Jaguar] bridge pup.
actually, no you don't have to. on a jaguar and jazzmaster you can just pop the pickups out without removing the guard.Mike wrote:Indeed. I'll probably do it when I get home or something. I'll need to take off the guard to get in there with the pickups I think, but it's only ten screws or whatever.
UNLESS you wanna make sure there's no extra routes under it...
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
good luck, lemme know if you need any help...
(by golly it's only some screws!)
Pat.
my name is Pat.
yep it can get quite like a sickness...benecol wrote:I must admit, if it was mine, I'd have been under there already. Supremely jealous of all these new Jags.
most of the times i play the guitar for 10 mins to see if it works properly and then i feel the urge to screwdrive into it...
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Pat.
ps: oh yeah... now i've gotta look into that old aria diamond that i got with it. it's all working a-ok but it's got a bad ground. so... there i goooooooooooooooo!!!
Last edited by Pacafeliz on Wed Sep 16, 2009 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
my name is Pat.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
I took my Jag apart (or bits of it) tonight and they're definitely the original pickups, thankfully. In fact I doubt the guitar has been taken apart ever before. The pickups were way tight in the guard from the celluloid shrinking and so was the trapezium plate. I had to really struggle to get the guard up (and back on, specially over the control plate) and also to get the pickups up, but it's definitely all original. No wiring has been replaced and what I can see of the pickups under the claw section over the bottom is a beige/grey colour (with a torch).
So that's put that to bed. Maybe when I restring I'll take some pictures and sand the edges of the pickguard to make the fit less insanely snug.
So that's put that to bed. Maybe when I restring I'll take some pictures and sand the edges of the pickguard to make the fit less insanely snug.
- hotrodperlmutter
- crescent fresh
- Posts: 16665
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
sorry to add to the hijack pat, still a beaut even though you're keeping that guard, but -
the f-tuners on your jag confuse me mike. were they standard then? i always guessed it was a late 60's thang.
my 66RI jag (as i was told it was) has klusons. i assumed that was standard. where can i see what's most prevalent, as i'm starting to question what RI my jag is?
cheers to both of you for making me jealous!
the f-tuners on your jag confuse me mike. were they standard then? i always guessed it was a late 60's thang.
my 66RI jag (as i was told it was) has klusons. i assumed that was standard. where can i see what's most prevalent, as i'm starting to question what RI my jag is?
cheers to both of you for making me jealous!
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
- Mike
- I like EL34s
- Posts: 39170
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:30 am
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
- Contact:
The 66RI is a little "off" to be honest on a couple of cases, it should definitely have binding for a start, and the tuners are another thing. They were introduced to Fender guitars one at a time and the Jaguar was the first to get them. August 1965 is the date most people quote for this.
64-68 was a period of massive change or TRANSITION as Fender buffs call it.
64-68 was a period of massive change or TRANSITION as Fender buffs call it.
Last edited by Mike on Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- .
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:43 pm
- Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Yeah man, F tuners were put on starting it late '65. My '66 Mustang has them too.
And whats funny about the RI's, the '65 RI's have F tuners, but the '69 RI's have Klusons![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
And whats funny about the RI's, the '65 RI's have F tuners, but the '69 RI's have Klusons
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Last edited by purplehaze19x on Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lifetime noob