Page 1 of 2
What should I do with my Jaguar rhythm circuit?
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:50 pm
by Thom
So, I categorically never use the rhythm circuit on my Jag, and I've always thought that it was a bit of a waste of space/opportunity to put something I would find useful there.
Have considered a built in effect of some sort, maybe a fernandez sustainer.
Anyway, what would you do if you were to replace the rhythm circuit with something else?
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:53 pm
by benecol
Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer. I'd bung in either a fuzz or a boost; one of my favourite things about my Dano's has always been that you get quite a boost in the middle pickup position. You know, for those days when you don't want to move your foot...
I vote Rangemaster.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:55 pm
by Bacchus
benecol wrote:Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer.
As far as I know it involves installing their neck humbucker.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:56 pm
by benecol
Pretty sure there's a load of gubbins in between under the scratchplate.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:57 pm
by Thom
BacchusPaul wrote:benecol wrote:Pretty sure you have to carry out all sorts of fuckery under the scratchplate to fit a sustainer.
As far as I know it involves installing their neck humbucker.
Ah ok! Shows how much research I did into this.
I was thinking maybe fuzz, as I don't have one on my board at the moment (or in general)...
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:57 pm
by laterallateral
I would pop a tremolo in there with a simple rate/depth/on/off.
it's the kind of effect that people typically do a lot of on-offing with, so putting it right there on the guitar would be convenient.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:58 pm
by Thom
laterallateral wrote:I would pop a tremolo in there with a simple rate/depth/on/off.
it's the kind of effect that people typically do a lot of on-offing with, so putting it right there on the guitar would be convenient.
Nice...I like this suggestion...
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:14 pm
by Reece
if it's possible, fuzz AND hard clip tremolo.
one knob is mix fuzz/trem.
other knob is trem rate.
i have no idea if you could screw around with two of those modboard things from GFS or whatever to do that, or if they would even fit in the cavity but it would be awesome if you could.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:15 pm
by the isaac eaton
theremin plate that controls a crazy moog synth sequencer that is also in your guitar, also you will need a FM radio tuner, a remote control for a microwave oven, an aquarium, laser light projector, flame thrower, Kaoss pad used as a midi controller to control how high your drummer's drum riser is, thrown an analog delay and a barrack obama sound board in there and you are good to go.
Get to work on that.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:16 pm
by Thom
the isaac eaton wrote:theremin plate that controls a crazy moog synth sequencer that is also in your guitar, also you will need a FM radio tuner, a remote control for a microwave oven, an aquarium, laser light projector, flame thrower, Kaoss pad used as a midi controller to control how high your drummer's drum riser is, thrown an analog delay and a barrack obama sound board in there and you are good to go.
Get to work on that.
Damn now why didn't I think of that!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b57a/3b57a45963edf9b5d1c6102e4d2c1f42c3cd97f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:19 pm
by laterallateral
A theremin would be FREAKING AWESOME, though.
wire up the truss rod in your neck to act as the pitch control and the plate itself as the volume.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:19 pm
by Fran
Theres aplenty of MicroFX out there, i've considered this many times. What would be more usefull Thom? Onboard boost, comp, fuzz, tem, delay..?
Personally, considering restrictions based on design size, i would avoid stuff too complicated. I would go for something more practical like an onboard clean boost switch.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:20 pm
by the isaac eaton
honestly it was my first thought
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:22 pm
by Reece
actually i think an onboard delay would be awesome.
much easier for screwing around the controls so it goes all glitchy, or the ability to have a "self oscillate" switch on the guitar.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:24 pm
by Thom
Fran wrote:Theres aplenty of MicroFX out there, i've considered this many times. What would be more usefull Thom? Onboard boost, comp, fuzz, tem, delay..?
Personally, considering restrictions based on design size, i would avoid stuff too complicated. I would go for something more practical like an onboard clean boost switch.
Absolutely Fran, am thinking simple. Boost is the most obvious choice, but I have 2 boosts on my board, so think that that would be a bit of a waste.
Things currently missing from my board that I may use most are trem and fuzz.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:25 pm
by Thom
Reece wrote:actually i think an onboard delay would be awesome.
much easier for screwing around the controls so it goes all glitchy, or the ability to have a "self oscillate" switch on the guitar.
Also good points!
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:49 pm
by Fran
Some modestly priced boosts and distortions
HERE.
Judging by Owens guitar onboard tremolo could sond good. Not sure what circuit was used there though.
Hmm...
Tremololz!
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:59 pm
by Noirie.
Fran wrote:Judging by Owens guitar onboard tremolo could sond good. Not sure what circuit was used there though.
I'm 100% certain its a EA Tremolo.
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:39 pm
by robert(original)
put some toggles on there and rock a ROT YR BRAIN!
the tremolo idea is pretty good tho...
Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 11:51 pm
by Doog
KILL
SWITCH