Fender Lead II for $300?
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:49 am
Now thats a deal worth posting. Want that bad!
Page 1 of 1
Re: Fender Lead II for $300?
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:25 am
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:46 am
Note that the bridge is NOT stock ! Someone has buggered that otherwise fantastic specimen of the Lead Series. In fact if you look closely I'm positive the body had been routed to accept the bridge. It's lost all its' "collectibilty" value. To top it all off I just saw a original replacement bridge, for $125.00.
Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks for recent production Squier (rosewood) fretboard for the Lead II and Starcaster maple/maple fretboard on the Lead III to save the originals from wear.
Just noticed the headstock has been drilled for a locking nut as well. What a shame. Now it's a candidate for Pro Sound Project where they restore Lead Series Guitars.
Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks for recent production Squier (rosewood) fretboard for the Lead II and Starcaster maple/maple fretboard on the Lead III to save the originals from wear.
Just noticed the headstock has been drilled for a locking nut as well. What a shame. Now it's a candidate for Pro Sound Project where they restore Lead Series Guitars.
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:47 am
something tells me that ends isn't the collective type. now rocking? fuck yeah
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:52 am
lol, collectabiliy.Haze wrote:something tells me that ends isn't the collective type. now rocking? fuck yeah
The only guitar I own that isn't hacked to holy hell is the m-80. Because well, it's perfect as is.
Swapping necks, really man? You're just denying it mojo. It's a guitar not a mutual fund. Rock that shit.
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:59 am
And that lead is tits modified or no. I love how hard that things been played. Someone obviously loved that guitar.
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 6:05 am
so many things to love about that
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 3:36 am
endsjustifymeans wrote:It's a guitar not a mutual fund. Rock that shit.
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:58 am
LOLNJjoanjettfan wrote: Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks for recent production Squier (rosewood) fretboard for the Lead II and Starcaster maple/maple fretboard on the Lead III to save the originals from wear.
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:00 am
NO.endsjustifymeans wrote:And that lead is tits modified or no. I love how hard that things been played. Someone obviously loved that guitar.
LOVE IS TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED ROOMS AND THE FIRST BOX OF THE PENTATONIC SCALE.
oh wait.
that's HAET.
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:58 am
Please please please buy that and post as many pictures as you can.
I've been jonesing for those obscure Fender models for the longest time. My '81 Bullet was only the beginning!
I've been jonesing for those obscure Fender models for the longest time. My '81 Bullet was only the beginning!
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:10 am
+1rlm2112 wrote:LOLNJjoanjettfan wrote: Boy am I glad I got my Fender Lead II and Lead III when I did. I've even swapped off the necks for recent production Squier (rosewood) fretboard for the Lead II and Starcaster maple/maple fretboard on the Lead III to save the originals from wear.
isnt that ridiculous
why dont you just play the squier then?
and if an when it needs a fret job it gets one!
who are you saving this guitar for?
shouldnt owning it and picking it up be a joy without wondering what it may do to the value?
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:32 am
Exactly. Like ends said, it's a guitar...not a mutual fund. Unless it was owned by the kurdtz or something, play it.