Which Jaguar

The original shortscale guitars; Mustangs, Duo-Sonics, Musicmasters, Jaguars, Broncos, Jag-stang, Jagmaster, Super-Sonic, Cyclone, and Toronados.

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Which Jaguar

Post by Gabriel »

So I'm busy saving, selling, begging and doing what not to scrape enough money to buy myself a Fender Jaguar and basically within my budget I have 2 options. A CIJ Jaguar or a Classic Player.

I'm a bit skeptical with the mexican fenders, but the mods seem to make the guitar closer to what I'd end up doing a CIJ anyway.

How are the Classic Players then?

Gabe
User avatar
mickie08
.
.
Posts: 6417
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Carlsbad, Ca
Contact:

Post by mickie08 »

mexi all the way. The pups are better, and I like the general setup just fine. They are both fine guitars, but most people are not really happy with Japanese pups.
They say great minds think alike....Sometimes we do too...
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

the cij jags i've picked up felt smooth to play and all like a guitar that's been played for ages but the pickups, especially if you're a fan of fuzzed out and distorted things they sounds a bit boxy, like cij stangs too.
the mexi ones felt a bit less comfortable but the pickups sound more 'open' and alive with distortion yeah.

did play them upside down with upside down strings so not like how i usually play guitar, limited in the chords i can play upside down ect but the feel of the neck of a cij is smoother than the mexi's, my opinion anyway.
User avatar
goldengurls
.
.
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Baltimore
Contact:

Post by goldengurls »

cij
mustang afflicted duo sonic II junkie.
User avatar
laterallateral
Traynor or Death
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Montery Howl

Post by laterallateral »

CP all the way
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

CIJ with AVRI pups.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

i would go with the japan model simply based on the neck


they are 2 completely different necks.

the japan version has a vintage style roundy fretboard with vintage style thin frets.
the mexican has a flat(er) fretboard bigger frets


i like my fenders to feel like fenders. by that saying i want the neck to mimic my jagstang neck as much as possible since its the best neck ever made on a guitar.
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
aen
Turdscreamer
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:07 am
Location: ELECTRIC WARRIOR
Contact:

Post by aen »

Classic Player. The bridge works, the trem works, it sounds good. CIJ? The pickups are shit, and your strings will fly off the saddles. Unless you feel like a project, get the mim. Actually, the MIM single coil jag I had was one of the best guitars I ever had. Like, seriously. 50's tele> MIM jag >69 Jag>Tele custom II. Like a dumbass, i thought a jazzmaster would be even better and I sold it. ME SO STUPID.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
User avatar
kypdurron
.
.
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:51 pm
Location: Kaiser Wilhelm Kuntry

Post by kypdurron »

robroe wrote:i would go with the japan model simply based on the neck
that.

Unless you like the mexi necks better, which is actually something nobody can tell you.
User avatar
Ankhanu
.
.
Posts: 2995
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: Nova Scotia
Contact:

Post by Ankhanu »

I've played a CP HH; it was nice enough.

I own a MIJ '66 Classic, and I love it. The neck pickup is pretty nice sounding, but the bridge alone is kinda thin... but with a little more playing, I've actually gotten to like it alone too :P The output is pretty low, though; the CP pickups are much higher output and will drive the front end of your amp better. A boost pedal with the MIJ pickups will do the same though...
As for the bridge, once I went to a heavier gauge string, I have had no issues with the bridge and strings popping out of the grooves.


Really, play them both. Each has its advantages; the CP pickups are more powerful, but the MIJ plays/feels better... and depending on your tastes, the pickups may suit just fine.
User avatar
robroe
Bon Jovi Fan Club!!1
Posts: 49936
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:00 pm

Post by robroe »

i can make my american jaguar sound thin and tinny. fairly easy just with fucking with the switches n shit on the guitar. when you turn the switch on the top horn it can cound bassy as fuck.


its the most versitle sounding guitar i have ever owned. you can make it go from a tin can to a sub woofer without fucking around with any knobs on a peddal or the amp
dots wrote:incesticide
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

yep. rob gets it.
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

kypdurron wrote:
robroe wrote:i would go with the japan model simply based on the neck
that.

Unless you like the mexi necks better, which is actually something nobody can tell you.
i prefer the CP neck. not a fan of CIJs, really.
Image
User avatar
dots
BADmin (he/him)
Posts: 1022402
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:16 pm
Location: Esco-A-Go-Go
Contact:

Post by dots »

i'm not a huge fan of the aesthetics of the cp's myself. i've played a few of the jazzmasters and jaguars at guitar center, and they've all left me pretty meh. the only cij i've had enough experience to comment about have been my hh jags, and both have had supreme necks. electronics were so-so, and hardware was above average.
User avatar
Tweedledee
.
.
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:16 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Post by Tweedledee »

I actually like both, but like others have said, it depends on what you're looking for. If you want the classic Jag feel, go for the CIJ. If you want the Jag look but a more modern feel (and tone), go for the Classic Player. I would probably go for the CIJ and swap the pickups.
User avatar
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:

Post by stewart »

actually, i say i don't like CIJ necks; the B&B ones on hurb's faux XII and gavin's jag both felt really nice, maybe the binding makes them feel comfier to me.
Image
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

Some good points on the aspect of tinkering, if your not that way inclined go for the MIM, but if you want vintage vibe the CIJ is closer but there will be a price to pay.
User avatar
Gabriel
.
.
Posts: 3178
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:46 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Gabriel »

I think I'm gonna go with a CIJ one. I prefer the idea of a more vintage feeling guitar. Also I'm really experianced in modifying guitars therefore I think it'd be more fun and probably end up slightly nicer than a CP.
User avatar
hotrodperlmutter
crescent fresh
Posts: 16665
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA

Post by hotrodperlmutter »

there's a nice MIJ one from the 80's going for like $500 on the bay.
dots wrote:fuck that guy in his bunkhole.
User avatar
Fran
The Curmudgeon
Posts: 22219
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Nottingham, Englandshire.

Post by Fran »

mrperson wrote:I think I'm gonna go with a CIJ one. I prefer the idea of a more vintage feeling guitar. Also I'm really experianced in modifying guitars therefore I think it'd be more fun and probably end up slightly nicer than a CP.
Cool. Once you get your head around the bridge issues and whiny bridge pup you'll love it. Plenty of guides on bridge set up on shortscalegeardemos too ;)