ShortScale.org

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 12:43 pm**

dont make em like they used to

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 1:03 pm**

thank christ. That burst is hideous.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 1:10 pm**

Looks just like my '62...

► Show Spoiler

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 1:25 pm**

uglyburst but the countours are so pretty. i like the more chubby countours

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 2:58 pm**

I kinda like the burst, reminds me of a bucket my grandmother has that has the same "burst".

I bet it even smells the same. Potatoes and dirt.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 3:08 pm**

Holy Fire-Glo, Batman!

Fullerton isn't exactly adjacent to Santa Ana, but with a burst like that you'd think that a Ric employee pulled an inter-OC espionage job.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 4:15 pm**

Thom wrote:Looks just like my '62...

Wow, that's one clean '62. Is it all original?

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 4:53 pm**

That original photo is so obviously tinted red or been buggered with it's not even funny. Poor colour representation.

Judging by Thom's I'd totally rock that burst. Looks ace. In fact, I'd rock the original if it was actually that colour.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm**

cooterfinger wrote:
Thom wrote:Looks just like my '62...
Wow, that's one clean '62. Is it all original?

It is all original, including the case, and it sounds really great!

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 7:16 pm**

Thom wrote:
cooterfinger wrote:
Thom wrote:Looks just like my '62...
Wow, that's one clean '62. Is it all original?
It is all original, including the case, and it sounds really great!

Looks amazing.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 7:17 pm**

Thanks very much

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 7:18 pm**

It's looks kinda crappy, but I like it.

It is in great condition, considering it's age.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 9:17 pm**

Reminds me of Ween

[youtube][/youtube]

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 9:24 pm**

GeorgeF wrote:That original photo is so obviously tinted red or been buggered with it's not even funny. Poor colour representation.

Judging by Thom's I'd totally rock that burst. Looks ace. In fact, I'd rock the original if it was actually that colour.

Different burst dude - the original pic is the rare 60s "sienna burst" whereas Thom's is the usual three-colour.
By the way Thom, is it really a 62 with the neck dated 1-61? If so that neck was vintage by the time they bolted it up!

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 9:26 pm**

rare "sienna burst" i.e. "oh shit we ran out of black"

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 9:29 pm**

I think this qualifies as Fender's clownburst.

Posted: **Tue May 11, 2010 10:19 pm**

I like it. Too bad Squier chose the crappy Desert Tan for their duo instead of the awesomeness of maroonburst.

Posted: **Wed May 12, 2010 12:22 am**

yeah the tan is a let down, it looks better in person, but no

Posted: **Wed May 12, 2010 7:54 am**

MatthewK wrote:
GeorgeF wrote:That original photo is so obviously tinted red or been buggered with it's not even funny. Poor colour representation.

Judging by Thom's I'd totally rock that burst. Looks ace. In fact, I'd rock the original if it was actually that colour.
Different burst dude - the original pic is the rare 60s "sienna burst" whereas Thom's is the usual three-colour.
By the way Thom, is it really a 62 with the neck dated 1-61? If so that neck was vintage by the time they bolted it up!

Mine's not regular burst, it's just that some of the photos are a bit dark - there's no black on it at all, the edges are maroon/sienna, whatever you want to call it. And yeah, definitely a '62 - pups and pots dated so, guess they used a '61 neck that they had left over

Posted: **Wed May 12, 2010 12:19 pm**

I'm not really disputing the fact there's a sienna/maroon burst in existence, more that the photo does not have decent colour representation i.e. the whole picture is tinted red lel

ShortScale.org

duo-gasm

duo-gasm