Anyone know a simple 1 octave down circuit?
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:09 pm
With no fuzz? Thanks!
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:30 pm
I don't think they ever get that simple, but early designs like the EHX Octave Multiplexer, Maestro Octave Box and Mutron Octave Divider might be a place to start.
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:34 pm
I had dreams of one day having the time to make one too, and I had these saved:
Analog Alchemy "Shocktave" -- http://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalch ... ktave.html
The significantly more complex EHX Octave Multiplexer circuit:
Analog Alchemy "Shocktave" -- http://www.diystompboxes.com/analogalch ... ktave.html
The significantly more complex EHX Octave Multiplexer circuit:
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 8:52 pm
Thanks!!!!
Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:47 pm
I think the "cleanest" octave down is the Boss OC-2. You could make the circuit smaller by eliminating the octave up part and the flip-flop switching.
The problem with things like the Blue Box or the Shocktave is they start out as a square wave which uses a flip-flop to generate a square wave triggered by rising and falling edges that exceed a threshold.
The OC-2 also uses a flip-flop but doesn't use the flip-flops output directly. It uses it indirectly to kind of gate the original signal at half the frequency.
Short of going digital, a stripped down OC-2 is your best bet for the cleanest octave down. All the other ones are going to have a synth/ring mod/fuzz sound along with the octave.
The problem with things like the Blue Box or the Shocktave is they start out as a square wave which uses a flip-flop to generate a square wave triggered by rising and falling edges that exceed a threshold.
The OC-2 also uses a flip-flop but doesn't use the flip-flops output directly. It uses it indirectly to kind of gate the original signal at half the frequency.
Short of going digital, a stripped down OC-2 is your best bet for the cleanest octave down. All the other ones are going to have a synth/ring mod/fuzz sound along with the octave.