how much 'bleed' do you tolerate?
Moderated By: mods
- gaybear
- Inventor of the Blues
- Posts: 9697
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:52 pm
- Location: hard corvallis, oregon
- Contact:
how much 'bleed' do you tolerate?
plenty, some, none at all?
personally i like a little bit of bleed. it makes the over all track feel more cohesive. within reason of course.
except on the vocal track i suppose
personally i like a little bit of bleed. it makes the over all track feel more cohesive. within reason of course.
except on the vocal track i suppose
plopswagon wrote: Drunk and disorderly conduct is the cradle of democracy.
- laterallateral
- Traynor or Death
- Posts: 5950
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
- Location: Montery Howl
Yeah I totally don't mind a bit of bleed, like cymbals in my guitar tracks or bass in the drum track...
If you're recording off the floor like that, you're probably looking for a "live feel" which is exactly what you get when your shit bleeds trough a little, IMO.
If you're recording off the floor like that, you're probably looking for a "live feel" which is exactly what you get when your shit bleeds trough a little, IMO.
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
Depends on the piece. Usually I need a BIG. Drum sound, so it's pretty shitty to have all the other Instruments spilling over into the distance mic.
A little bit is usually fine, the other night we did a percussion track with four mics and everybody was in everybodys track, but it was cool, cause we panned that shit. HARD. Bass guitar getting out is a big problem for me though. We tried to do some live tracking with 2 guitars, bass and drums, and it just turned into mush from the bass bouncing all over. I imagine in a lower volume situation it would be easier to deal with, but we ended up with seven tracks of "bass and..." and one of bass.
So in general, I dislike bleed. I do a fine job of making shit sound live when it ain't.
A little bit is usually fine, the other night we did a percussion track with four mics and everybody was in everybodys track, but it was cool, cause we panned that shit. HARD. Bass guitar getting out is a big problem for me though. We tried to do some live tracking with 2 guitars, bass and drums, and it just turned into mush from the bass bouncing all over. I imagine in a lower volume situation it would be easier to deal with, but we ended up with seven tracks of "bass and..." and one of bass.
So in general, I dislike bleed. I do a fine job of making shit sound live when it ain't.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
- UlricvonCatalyst
- .
- Posts: 767
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:19 am
There's no one hard-and-fast rule regarding bleed, though as others have mentioned it's a good idea to try and minimise the amount of bass leaking onto the other tracks as it can muddy up the track.
Personally, I like a bit of guitar bleeding onto the drum track. I'd go as far as to say my favourite recordings are ones which actually sound like a band is playing together in a room.
Personally, I like a bit of guitar bleeding onto the drum track. I'd go as far as to say my favourite recordings are ones which actually sound like a band is playing together in a room.
usually some bleed on the vocals tracks, i need to record them to a really loud backing, but i don't mind, i usually keep the vocals centered so it blends well with a bit of bleed on the tracks. the other things like guitars and bass are usually recorded without a mic but with line out on a small amp i have or sometimes even just straight from my pedalboard into a usb interface into my laptop so no bleed.
Right. With some seriously pro isolation, barriers, spacing, and other super ninja recording tricks.robroe wrote:all bleed. all live. all the time.
relationship of command was recorded live in the studio. they just set up mic's and played
And certainly no overdubs.
That just wouldnt be punk rock.
High quality, low popularity Ecstatic Fury
aen wrote:Right. With some seriously pro isolation, barriers, spacing, and other super ninja recording tricks.robroe wrote:relationship of command was recorded live in the studio. they just set up mic's and played
And certainly no overdubs.
When bands say they tracked stuff "live in the studio" they don't mean the amps were pushed up against the drums or they were all crowded around in a circle, or even in the same room.
I once tracked "live in the studio" without being able to see my drummer because he was 2 doors down the hall. We were still playing at the same time but it wouldn't have been different to if we were playing to a drum track or if he was playing to a click/guitar accompaniment. The bass player could see each of us through little windows, but he was the only one who could see everybody.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
I didn't know that, but I tend to agree. This also delves into the question of one take or one track at a time. One takE!robroe wrote:all bleed. all live. all the time.
relationship of command was recorded live in the studio. they just set up mic's and played
There's a snake in my boots. Someone poisoned the water hole!
- Freddy V-C
- NOD FLANGERS
- Posts: 5591
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 4:55 pm
Recording my band's most recent EP everything was recorded live except the vocals. All the amps and the drumkit were mic'd up in essentially the same room but it was divided into sections by some movable sound-proof wall type things. So the drumkit and each of the amps were essentially isolated from eachother. There's a little bit of bleed but not a lot, and the small amount there is makes everything sound that bit more 'live'. I've recorded with loads of bleed before though and it's sounded like turd...
This post reminded me that Monte Allums makes a bypass mod for the Boss SD-1..
Durango Guitar Works 24" Short Scale Guitar
http://durangoguitarworks.com/
http://durangoguitarworks.com/