Is there chance this is amything other than Olympic White?
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:08 am
it has a light blueish shade (or my eyes are seeing that) but it cant be daphne blue with white switches right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99436/99436b47e41ee90b4d4fc7a4ff4f0ffdd63bd6dc" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e513/3e5138aa75d9472383f7fd1350987204455ee872" alt="Image"
Since 2006
https://bestnetworx.net/
riotshield wrote:it has a light blueish shade (or my eyes are seeing that) but it cant be daphne blue with white switches right?
are you sure? i'm not sure.weeping_moon wrote:riotshield wrote:it has a light blueish shade (or my eyes are seeing that) but it cant be daphne blue with white switches right?
thats olympic white. very very nice color!
on second thoughts, you're right.stewart wrote:are you sure? i'm not sure.weeping_moon wrote:riotshield wrote:it has a light blueish shade (or my eyes are seeing that) but it cant be daphne blue with white switches right?
thats olympic white. very very nice color!
can you post a picture? was it brown tort from the beginning or was it red?Rox wrote:69 RI ? Very pretty . I have an Antique white 69 RI. Practically yellow . Sounds ugly but with the brown tort pickguard it's actually very nice . My first intentions was to get an Olympic white but they just weren't out there at the time I was buying .
maybe.weeping_moon wrote:
wait a minute!
the body looks so thin. on the 65 reissues the body is thicker! could that be a blue comp-stang that they have painted white?
when i did take a closer look. the body looks so comp-stang. i would say with 99.9 % its a comp-stang.stewart wrote:maybe.weeping_moon wrote:
wait a minute!
the body looks so thin. on the 65 reissues the body is thicker! could that be a blue comp-stang that they have painted white?
when I did tooked a nearer gander, methinks tis a 69RI that has been dipped in whale semen. I'd have to lick it to be so sure.weeping_moon wrote:when i did take a closer look. the body looks so comp-stang. i would say with 99.9 % its a comp-stang.stewart wrote:maybe.weeping_moon wrote:
wait a minute!
the body looks so thin. on the 65 reissues the body is thicker! could that be a blue comp-stang that they have painted white?
Aye, just the camera/lighting. That doesn't explain the contour looking bit. Prolly a '69.laterallateral wrote:Unless those pickup covers are equally obtusely blue, I'd say it's the lighting.
yes, the flash it bounces off the white and blinds us all into seeing blue.. or somethingcobascis wrote:Aye, just the camera/lighting. That doesn't explain the contour looking bit. Prolly a '69.laterallateral wrote:Unless those pickup covers are equally obtusely blue, I'd say it's the lighting.
Not a Mustang. That's a... Uh... Hardtail CYCLOEN??DanHeron wrote:It's white.
the end.
however check this japanese mustang:
I like it.
weeping_moon wrote:can you post a picture? was it brown tort from the beginning or was it red?Rox wrote:69 RI ? Very pretty . I have an Antique white 69 RI. Practically yellow . Sounds ugly but with the brown tort pickguard it's actually very nice . My first intentions was to get an Olympic white but they just weren't out there at the time I was buying .
No but it IS a mustang. ISHIBASHI LINK.laterallateral wrote: Not a Mustang. That's a... Uh... Hardtail CYCLOEN??
WANT. That is the ideal Mustang for me. How much do the 69 Reissues go for?Rox wrote:weeping_moon wrote:can you post a picture? was it brown tort from the beginning or was it red?Rox wrote:69 RI ? Very pretty . I have an Antique white 69 RI. Practically yellow . Sounds ugly but with the brown tort pickguard it's actually very nice . My first intentions was to get an Olympic white but they just weren't out there at the time I was buying .
Here she is .
![]()