Page 1 of 2
Fender 60th Anniversary Telecasters at NAMM
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:26 pm
by westtexasred
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:19 pm
by GreenKnee
I need the rosewood tele, such a sexy axe!
How come some have the good old school bridges, and some have the shitty new one? I bet the ones with proper bridges cost lots of ££££
Jack
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm
by mellowlogic
mmmm tele with blocks <3 <3 <3
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:49 pm
by stewart
some of those are properly hideous.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:10 pm
by Mo Law-ka
WHAT THE HELL.
WHERE WAS THIS WHEN I WAS BUYING MY TELE CUSTOM!?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:26 pm
by gaybear
Mo Rawka wrote:
WHAT THE HELL.
WHERE WAS THIS WHEN I WAS BUYING MY TELE CUSTOM!?
seriously, i love it!
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 9:46 pm
by dezb1
Mo Rawka wrote:
WHAT THE HELL.
WHERE WAS THIS WHEN I WAS BUYING MY TELE CUSTOM!?
It was being hidden from sight due to its extreme ugliness, why why why ruin a crackin looking guitar? (blocks more like bollocks)
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2011 11:15 pm
by othomas2
blocks no binding ? That's worse than having no blocks in the first place... booo...
binding and dots would have looked better.
Re: Fender 60th Anniversary Telecasters at NAMM
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:48 pm
by BoringPostcards
NO ashtray bridge on the 60th anniversary tele? Fail. Also, those modern tuners, however good they are, look hideous.
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:45 pm
by jim93
I hate the blocks wish they would of never put them on jaguars as well.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:23 am
by ultratwin
Verdict in. One every month starting in March. Both El Cabron and the '75 JB will be sold at $1799.
Music Zoo pictorz:
LUNK
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c8d2/4c8d2c94e632f73c94c9103a306ea85551de08ac" alt="Image"
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:27 am
by Mike
I really really can't stand the tuners and bridges they stick on the American Standards.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:36 am
by benecol
Same same - this is going to sound terribly purist and amber switch tips, but for me*, it's not a tele unless it's got a three saddle ashtray bridge, it's such a part of the playing and feel of the guitar.
* Not you, me. You probably disagree. Because you've got one.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:43 am
by Mike
I don't, I sold my Baja to Rob.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:34 am
by benecol
I didn't mean you, I meant whoever reads my post and shouts "Poppycock!".
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:56 am
by George
I wouldn't own a Tele without one. 6 saddle is Strat territory.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:00 pm
by benecol
Needs the edges as well - took me ages to get used to playing them, but now a tele without them feels all wrong, and throws my (terrible) technique.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:48 pm
by lorez
benecol wrote:it's not a tele unless it's got a three saddle ashtray bridge, it's such a part of the playing and feel of the guitar.
i feel the same way, these bridges plates without the lip look broken to me
Re: Fender 60th Anniversary Telecasters at NAMM
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:28 pm
by Billy3000
ZenJenga wrote:
NO ashtray bridge on the 60th anniversary tele? Fail. Also, those modern tuners, however good they are, look hideous.
They're really missing the mark on their 60th anniversary models. They're not sticking to the original design at all but still calling it a 60th anniversary for some reason. Everyone at Talkbass is up in arms about their 60th anniversary p bass model which looks like this:
They just took pieces of every era of the p bass and slapped it together and called it an anniversary model.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:33 pm
by Richard
othomas2 wrote:blocks no binding ? That's worse than having no blocks in the first place... booo...
binding and dots would have looked better.
This. Blocks without binding is shite. Also, why didn't they use the proper Fender block dimensions? Did they outsource the production of these shit necks to Warmoth?
Fender blocks:
Warmoth blocks:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03233/0323385d780b36e4a86c369b720055725e5aeadb" alt="Image"