Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos
Moderated By: mods
Empires
.
Posts: 557 Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:
Post
by Empires » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:11 pm
Caught a bit of Hold Your Horse Is' set in Edinburgh tonight.
Guitarist had an interesting set up...
From what I could see and hear, it was like:
Neck Pickup -> Octave Down -> Amp 1
Bridge Pickup - > Amp 2
Didn't get a chance to see his pedals. I thought it sounded absolutely cracking
stewart
Cunning Linguist
Posts: 17644 Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:33 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Contact:
Post
by stewart » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:41 pm
BOOM
GeorgeF wrote: It's basically just got two outputs. One seperate output does neck pickup which feeds into a JCM800. The other is for the humbucker which feeds into a sub woofer type amp. Has no other volume or tone, switches etc. His pedals consist of a kill switch for the sub and a tuner.
Empires
.
Posts: 557 Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:
Post
by Empires » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:45 pm
Looks like I was a bit late to the party, then
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127 Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London
Post
by Doog » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:57 pm
Local H, yadda yadda..
shae
teh koolsie
Posts: 284 Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:32 am
Location: australia
Post
by shae » Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:12 am
Hahaha it's the new buzz thing from guitarists it seems.
Personally I like the 'Game Changer' or whatever it was called vs. that. I cannot tell the difference in real time. Definitely more a recording tool.
daphne blew krew
Mages
sรยบper crujiente
Posts: 7454 Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:34 pm
Location: MD
Contact:
Post
by Mages » Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:50 am
why would it be more of a recording tool? if you're recording it's a piece of piss to overdub multiple parts with different setups and instruments. it's a bit harder when you're playing live, hence why people double things up.
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693 Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:
Post
by timhulio » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:33 am
As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
George
.
Posts: 20953 Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK
Post
by George » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:36 am
But that wouldn't get threads started because of it! Also, I don't know if he's that tech savvy?
It sounds absolutely monstrous live.
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127 Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London
Post
by Doog » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:38 am
timhulio wrote: As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?
edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
wwrrss
COCKDESTROYER
Posts: 2268 Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:
Post
by wwrrss » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:47 am
might as well just split the signal after the guitar. even less work.
George
.
Posts: 20953 Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:52 am
Location: UK
Post
by George » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:49 am
Would you be able to separate the neck from bridge pickup?
timhulio
Redheaded Stepchild
Posts: 4693 Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:
Post
by timhulio » Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:57 am
Doog wrote: timhulio wrote: As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?
edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
Nah I think this is how stereo 345s and Rickenbackers work anyway. Stereo lead into a breakout box. Badda bing, badda boom.
wwrrss
COCKDESTROYER
Posts: 2268 Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:15 am
Location: Liverpool
Contact:
Post
by wwrrss » Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:05 am
GeorgeF wrote: Would you be able to separate the neck from bridge pickup?
nah, but I only ever use bridge pickups anyway.
Empires
.
Posts: 557 Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: All over central Scotland's face
Contact:
Post
by Empires » Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:53 pm
Doog wrote: timhulio wrote: As mentioned before, a stereo jack would be a more elegant solution.
Wouldn't that cause all sorts of ungodly ground loop hum, what with the amps sharing the ground connection?
edit: although.. I'm guessing both pickups would be grounded to the bridge anyways?
There was a massive amount of hum as it was... I thought it was just your bog standard single coil hum but it was pretty nasty.
If he doesn't have some sort of onboard octave down, then that amp he was using for the low end was a beast. I didn't recognise it.
grandnoise
.
Posts: 264 Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:47 am
Post
by grandnoise » Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:58 pm
I've modded my tele to have separate outputs for each pickup, more for fun than anything, I rarely use them but probably will do at some point for a dry and wet mix.
Dingus
.
Posts: 621 Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 4:26 pm
Location: Reston, VA
Post
by Dingus » Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:40 pm
Doog wrote: Local H, yadda yadda..
Doog beats me to the punch yet again...
Although last time I saw them he was rocking this setup:
That was in '04 though.
Doog
mid-century modem
Posts: 23127 Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 4:49 pm
Location: London
Post
by Doog » Wed Feb 09, 2011 7:10 pm
Empires wrote: If he doesn't have some sort of onboard octave down, then that amp he was using for the low end was a beast. I didn't recognise it.
I watched a load of live videos, doesn't look or sound like there's an octave pedal in his setup, just a second amp set bassier than the other.. makes the whole "output-per-pickup" seem even more overkill, but I guess you can't argue with results.
I'm guessing this mysterious little box is either a dirt box or just a muting pedal for the 2nd amp..?