ugly or beauty?
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:53 am
thoughts?
thoughts?
Page 1 of 2
thoughts?
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:59 am
Don't like the blade switch, and that it's too Jag/Jazzy shaped. I think the hardware would look better on something more Tiesco or Hagstrom shaped. It doesn't fill the Jag/Jazzy shoes well enough.
Either way: approved. But not quite beautiful.
Either way: approved. But not quite beautiful.
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:51 pm
Blade switches are always a fail on anything other than a Strat, never liked the the look of them. Are they mini-hums in that? If so that's a nice twist to a design that seems to be getting countless knock-offs just lately.
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:14 pm
i like everything but the headstock
i actually even kinda like the blade switch
i actually even kinda like the blade switch
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 7:28 pm
i want one of the three pickup doo-dads
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:21 pm
Ugly.
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:31 am
Headstock fail but kinda like the rest of it.
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:01 pm
Meh, the way it looks makes me not care about it in the slightest.
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 6:19 pm
seeing portugalwillie's sx tele deluxe in the flesh made me find the headstock not as vomit inducing as i'd hoped. it's actually not that bad, and if i got one, i'd probably just leave it be.
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 10:52 pm
why bother, just get a GFS.
Posted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:49 pm
I like em . Like the Harm6 in the ash better though.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:30 am
Speaking of ulgy, have you seen this from Rondo?
At least SX is using the better looking headstock again.
Also the Agile one is OK looking but like the GFS ones better.
At least SX is using the better looking headstock again.
Also the Agile one is OK looking but like the GFS ones better.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:37 am
Oh my that's unfortunate.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:46 am
it's begging for a bigsby. throw a cheap bigsby on there and it would look good.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:07 am
Lipstick on a pig man.
The other version was polarizing but the bottom curve at least flowed. They squared the above one off and it just looks hideous.
The other version was polarizing but the bottom curve at least flowed. They squared the above one off and it just looks hideous.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:44 am
oh snap. I didn't even look close enough to see that.
that is gross.
that is gross.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:46 am
yeah that's a bummer. a brand comes up with something unique and perty, and then fucks it all up.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:02 am
If you spread your legs far enough apart and use a footrest for your left side, the notch might actually make sense. Just add a pipe and argyle cardigan. Now the ugly is complete.portugalwillie wrote:oh snap. I didn't even look close enough to see that.
that is gross.
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:28 am
ultratwin wrote:If you spread your legs far enough apart and use a footrest for your left side, the notch might actually make sense. Just add a pipe and argyle cardigan. Now the ugly is complete.portugalwillie wrote:oh snap. I didn't even look close enough to see that.
that is gross.
are we talking about guitars or clitorises?
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:18 am
yes.