Quick test of rock band 3 squier stratocaster guitar midi
Moderated By: mods
- timhulio
- Redheaded Stepchild
- Posts: 4693
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Quick test of rock band 3 squier stratocaster guitar midi
This is really promising. You can hear it clicking away at the beginning, but once Squier figure out that musicians will buy this as well as gamers the glitches might be ironed-out. That or there outta be a DIY fix.
Courtesy of Matrixsynth blog:
http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/2011/03/quick-test-of-rock-band-3-squier.html
[youtube][/youtube]
Courtesy of Matrixsynth blog:
http://matrixsynth.blogspot.com/2011/03/quick-test-of-rock-band-3-squier.html
[youtube][/youtube]
- endsjustifymeans
- Grown Up Punk
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:02 pm
- Location: Ball So Hard University
Re: Quick test of rock band 3 squier stratocaster guitar mid
Isn't that just a metronome?timhulio wrote:This is really promising. You can hear it clicking away at the beginning
yes, you can control any midi enabled VSTi!sp3k wrote:The good thing about this is instead of using a keyboard to play with vst on abelton you can now use a guitar right?
could be very cool, down the line they might figure out a way to have the midi picked up bending strings - to me that's one of the things that makes a guitar a guitar.
- timhulio
- Redheaded Stepchild
- Posts: 4693
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
In case anyone isn't familiar with this rare Hagstrom/Ampeg item, the patch 2000 uses a pitch bend foot pedal, and the same pitch detection (via the frets) as the new squier controller. It's from the late 70s!GeorgeF wrote:That would be quite hard wouldn't it?
Combining a pitch bend wheel with a trem system would be more realistic.
It's crazy how well made and cheaply priced technology can be when they have a bigger sales audience and how that applies to music making
I was reading about a touch screen music company that made dedicated touch screens for music performance and they have basically been wiped out by the iPad. Eventhough the iPad was not specifically designed for music performance the technology is so good and the price is so low compared to the multi-thousand dollar dedicated music controllers.
I was reading about a touch screen music company that made dedicated touch screens for music performance and they have basically been wiped out by the iPad. Eventhough the iPad was not specifically designed for music performance the technology is so good and the price is so low compared to the multi-thousand dollar dedicated music controllers.
There's really no such thing as a "MIDI pickup". The things typically referred to as MIDI pickups are hexaphonic pickups that are essentially six individual pickups, one for each string -- hence, hexaphonic. They are not something you can just plug into a MIDI IN jack somewhere and start playing. I had no idea what the difference was until I started looking into ways to control my Moog with a guitar, a process I outlined with a lot of stupid words here:sp3k wrote:So, why is this better then a midi pickup?
Thoughts on the Sonuus G2M guitar-to-MIDI device...
As Tim pointed out, I also think this guitar is a great leap because it's not doing any pitch-to-MIDI conversion like typical MIDI guitar setups. There's latency associated with pitch-to-MIDI because of Science, which this system essentially removes.
The fact that the guitar isn't reliant upon pitch-to-MIDI also offers up a killer opportunity to tune the strings on the guitar to something other than standard tuning and use both the analog audio out with alternate tuning and standard-tuned MIDI in parallel during a live performance. Shit, that'd be cool.
timhulio wrote:In case anyone isn't familiar with this rare Hagstrom/Ampeg item, the patch 2000 uses a pitch bend foot pedal, and the same pitch detection (via the frets) as the new squier controller. It's from the late 70s!GeorgeF wrote:That would be quite hard wouldn't it?
Combining a pitch bend wheel with a trem system would be more realistic.
jcyphe wrote: Mo is the most sensible person in this thread.
icey wrote:and thats for the hatters (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻