good looking 3 on a side headstocks?
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:54 am
I was doodling some headstocks the other day, and i've always like 3 on a side ala gibson, or most acoustics. but it's hard to design anything new that ain't uuuugly.
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:01 pm
I like the Ovation Viper headstock? It's funky
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:09 pm
I like these but I think the reason they work is the guitar they're attached to, and the maple on the Tele prototype.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:08 pm
Ditto on the snakehead Broadcaster prototype headstock. I love that thing.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:22 pm
I think 3 and 3 is almost always better than 6 inline, for tuning and aesthetics.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:24 pm
I'll second the Airline "Gumby" headstock.
Also,
And I'll obviously say this one
Also,
And I'll obviously say this one
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:41 pm
Saw this one on ebay last night and kind of liked it for it's simplicity. Wouldn't take much to punch it up a little.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:45 pm
That Teisco one is very cool. As is the Maverick of course.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:55 pm
3 & 3 headstocks confuse me, they do look nice though.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:08 pm
That thing is very nice. Simple but good.cur wrote:Saw this one on ebay last night and kind of liked it for it's simplicity. Wouldn't take much to punch it up a little.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:19 pm
that tiesco reminds me of the John 5 tele headstock
I like the Epiphone headstock. Probably my favorie
I like the Epiphone headstock. Probably my favorie
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:40 pm
BC Rich is one of my favorites
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:43 pm
I love:
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:02 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:24 pm
whats so wrong with this?
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:25 pm
Hmmmmmmm??portugalwillie wrote:that tiesco reminds me of the John 5 tele headstock
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:43 pm
Nothin'Haze wrote:whats so wrong with this?
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:50 pm
Headstocks should be bigger. There's no reason that I can think of for them to be so small, and being bigger ought to give a better sound.
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:16 pm
