staining guitar necks.... in general
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 10:55 pm
ine
ABOUT EVERYTHING, GUY. THIS IS THE FUCKING THIRD THREAD EXACTLY GOD DAMN LIKE THE OTHERS.paulk1 wrote:what do you mean? serious about what the staining or the cabinet?
Nope. Same necks. Same guitars. Same fucked uploading. It hurts my eyes reading this thread.Ankhanu wrote:Are these even different necks than in the other threads about this stuff? They appear to be the same necks and the same guitar that've already been posted... am I missing something or is this just more spam?
first of all, wait a minute, i just thought of something, you guys are acking like promoting this stuff is a crime, why am i defending myself as is promoting was bad, im new to sitting on my computer, usually im doing something constructive but im tired of the bbq and figured ill see whats going on online, i cant work on my stuff because i am awaiting deliveries on my pparts to continue, i come on here and its like i did something wrong,IroniaSudby wrote:This guy is the greatest comeback troller in the history of shortscale.
Not only did he miss the point. He made a rebuttal AND THEN PROMOTED HIS THING FOR THE 4TH TIME.
AMAZING!
That wasn't so bad, was it? Look how quickly you got to the point!!paulk1 wrote:NO THE NECKS ARENT THE SAME, IF YOU WANT I CAN POST A PIC OF EACH ONE AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE FREAKIN GRAIN OF THE WOOD ON THE HEADSTOCK BEFORE THE NECKS ARE STAINED THE DARK AMBER WICH MAKES THEM LOOK THE SAME, YES, BUT THAT WAS THE WHOLE REASON I POSTED THIS THREAD WAS TO SEE WHY SOME AREAS ARE DARKER IN THE WOOD NEAR THE HEADSTOCK WHEN I STAIN WITH MAPLE OR LIGHT AMBER, "REASON WHY I MAKE THEM ALL LOOK THE SAME " DARK DARK AMBER,
Jags and Jazzies are fine, but it certainly wasn't clear that I was looking at something new when I opened the thread... it looked like the same story, the same necks, the same everything... with a new thread title. Your question on the differences of tinting was completely lost in the sea of the same stuff you've posted before.paulk1 wrote:IDK, SORRY FOR MY OBSESSION WITH JAZZMASTERS AND JAGUARS, I THOUGHT I WOULD FIT IN HERE BEING THAT IS WHAT I THOUGHT SHORTSCALE WAS, A JAGUAR, I GUESS THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT YOUR TEMPERS......
I'm on a 15" 2.2GHz quad core i7 MacBook Pro with 4Gb RAM... my system is plenty powerful.paulk1 wrote:IF IT TAKES YOU FUCKIN 30 MINUTES FOR YOUR COMPUTER TO LOAD MY PICS ON THIS THREAD THAT TOOK ME 30 SECONDS AFTER I HIT THE LINK ON MY GMAIL MESSAGE, THAN YOU SHOULD BUILD A NECK YOUR SELF AND SELL IT TO MAKE SOME MONEY AND GO TO THE APPLE STORE AND BUY A REAL COMPUTER THAT DOESNT TAKE 30 MINUTES TO LOAD A FEW PICTURES ON THIS THREAD, GOD THAT MUST SUCK,
...
GET A MAC
...
GET A MAC
...
here i am,.... hello get a mac
...
oh yeah, get a mac
Sorry, dude, it's not my computer that's the problem here.paulk1 wrote:INSTEAD OF ENCOURAGING A BROTHER FOR GOOD WORK, IT SEEMS THE SAME GUYS LIKE TO SPEND THE TIME TO WAIT FOR THERE CRAPPY PC'S TO LOAD MY PICTURES THAT THEY DONT EVEN LOOK AT GOOD ENOUGH TO REALIZE EACH NECK IS DIFFERENT, THEY JUST CANT WAIT FOR IT TO LOAD SO THEY COULD HIT REPLY AND SHOOT ME DOWN, JUST FOR THAT, I WILL POST EACH NECK AND YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE, K!
It's a beautiful guitar, and you should be proud of it. That doesn't excuse poor etiquette. You're being a douche and complaining when people get ticked about it.paulk1 wrote:YES THE GUITAR IS THE SAME, SORRY FOR POSTING IT IN 2 THREADS. THATS MY BABY I BUILT FROM SCRATCH AND PROUD OF IT, WELL, LETS SEE, 2 GUYS HATE ME HERE OUT OF HMMM,.......... THE WHOLE WORLD, NOT TOO BAD,
Message here: Don't give me the benefit of the doubt that I may be able to learn a little messageboard etiquette, I'm an ass. I do some good wood work, but I'm an ass and won't change.paulk1 wrote:A LITTLE ADVICE,
CANT STAND ME, DONT WAIT 30 MINUTES TO SEE MY PICS
The point, which has been made to you several times, is that the WAY you're posting your content does not make readers want to take the effort to pay close attention to the details. They're a jumbled mess; poorly laid out and sloppy. The wood work is fine, it's the posting that needs more effort.paulk1 wrote:these are the same, take a look at...
What else could it be? Try reading and actually considering the constructive comments and criticism you've received.paulk1 wrote:you guys are straight up HATERS,
im sorry , w the f else could it be, i sware to god, i never imagined posting these type of pictures on this type of site would get such a response.
This does seem to be the case... yes.paulk1 wrote:maybe i am missing the fucking point
So listen to, and take our advice. We're willing to help you if you're actually going to make an effort.paulk1 wrote:im not a computer geek
WAT.paulk1 wrote:IM FINALLY AT THE POINT WERE I SAY WTF IS WRONG WITH POSTING MY NEWESTEST STUFF AND QUESTIONS ABOUT IT, I DIDNT WANT TO SAY THIS BUT SERIOUSLY DID ANYONE EVER HERE OFF THE TERM "HATERS", I HATE TO USE IT BECAUSE ITS BIG IN THE RAP SEEN, BUT
WAT.paulk1 wrote:IF IT TAKES YOU FUCKIN 30 MINUTES FOR YOUR COMPUTER TO LOAD MY PICS ON THIS THREAD THAT TOOK ME 30 SECONDS AFTER I HIT THE LINK ON MY GMAIL MESSAGE, THAN YOU SHOULD BUILD A NECK YOUR SELF AND SELL IT TO MAKE SOME MONEY AND GO TO THE APPLE STORE AND BUY A REAL COMPUTER THAT DOESNT TAKE 30 MINUTES TO LOAD A FEW PICTURES ON THIS THREAD, GOD THAT MUST SUCK,
WAT.paulk1 wrote:INSTEAD OF ENCOURAGING A BROTHER FOR GOOD WORK, IT SEEMS THE SAME GUYS LIKE TO SPEND THE TIME TO WAIT FOR THERE CRAPPY PC'S TO LOAD MY PICTURES THAT THEY DONT EVEN LOOK AT GOOD ENOUGH TO REALIZE EACH NECK IS DIFFERENT, THEY JUST CANT WAIT FOR IT TO LOAD SO THEY COULD HIT REPLY AND SHOOT ME DOWN, JUST FOR THAT, I WILL POST EACH NECK AND YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE, K!
WAT.paulk1 wrote:WHATS YOUR PROBLEM, IF IT TAKES 30 MINUTES TO LOAD A FEW PICS, THAN YOU GUYS MUST LIKE TO TEST YOUR PATIENCE, AND RAM