Page 1 of 2
Gibson Firebird Non-Reverse Studio
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:34 pm
by GreenKnee
http://www2.gibson.com/Products/Electri ... verse.aspx
Looks pretty hot, coil tappable P-90s too. I don't really like the look of the pickup-selecter switch, or the fact that it hasn't got the old-school banjo tuners.
I can't seem to find a price, but I bet it is over-priced as ever.
Brian Wilson with his...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88e4e/88e4ebda8ef3f1056912367dea5ef60b3d72b81f" alt="Image"
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:41 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
blech
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:59 pm
by Fran
Love it. My mate has just bought an Epi non-reverse and its fucking cool. It has the two pups which i prefer, middle pups always end up sunk into the body with me..
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:01 pm
by George
I immediately say NO but then Brian looks fucking awesome so....
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:20 pm
by dezb1
Yes please!!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 10:52 pm
by gaybear
i think it's all sortsa great, except, man, that pu selector looks like trash.
anyhoo, looks versatile, and i'd rock it.
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:06 pm
by Pacafeliz
it sez $2,129msrp ... so that'd be around $1600-1800 street?
still too much. i refuse to buy new, except for squier maybe. and/or them new epis, too.
now, wait. there was an epi non-reverse firebird you say? when, where?!!!?
Pat.
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:10 pm
by Fran
Pacafeliz wrote:
now, wait. there was an epi non-reverse firebird you say? when, where?!!!?
Pat.
I cant find anything online, but i've seen it. I'll get some pics and try to find out more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/945da/945dabdc529a95b2b1e8fd9ee335cb6ce2f37772" alt="Wink :wink:"
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:16 pm
by Billy3000
I've always hated how the "non reverse" firebirds don't look anything like what a firebird would look like flipped.
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:38 pm
by Fran
Billy3000 wrote:I've always hated how the "non reverse" firebirds don't look anything like what a firebird would look like flipped.
Like Pawnshop Mustangs look nothing like Pawnshop Mustangs? I know what you mean. Its misleading.
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2011 11:54 pm
by paul_
Billy3000 wrote:I've always hated how the "non reverse" firebirds don't look anything like what a firebird would look like flipped.
They weren't supposed to, nor does the term "non-reverse" reference the Firebird. The Firebird was based on a flipped Jazzmaster but Fender got pissed about it, so the term "non-reverse" just meant they were no longer flipping the Jazzy. The original Firebird was meant to cop a Fender vibe in every way, that space-age look (they got a '50s auto designer to draw it) the custom colours (Pelham, Fiesta-type red) etc... and perhaps most tellingly, a "reverse" Fender-style headstock which is "non-reverse" on the non-reverse.
I actually hate non-reverse firebirds, but when it comes to the cheapo studio versions Gibson have definitely done better with this one than the regular firebird studio.
I'd take 3 P90s over zero minihums anyday.
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 12:20 am
by DanHeron
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 3:35 pm
by Fran
Fran wrote:Pacafeliz wrote:
now, wait. there was an epi non-reverse firebird you say? when, where?!!!?
Pat.
I cant find anything online, but i've seen it. I'll get some pics and try to find out more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/945da/945dabdc529a95b2b1e8fd9ee335cb6ce2f37772" alt="Wink :wink:"
Right. My mistake, its an Eastwood.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d9c/d4d9c93cdb78284be0bc6be7337f5045403bd9a4" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
Re: Gibson Firebird Non-Reverse Studio
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2011 6:55 pm
by JohnnyTheBoy
GreenKnee wrote:
Brian Wilson with his...
Errmm..slip of the tongue there matey...or fat-finger-typing ha ha!
..tis the cooler-than-cool
Brian Jones with Jagger back in 66
Here again with a Gibson Firebird III....
I visited his grave a while back as i was in the area....
As for the Reverse-firebird...i fuckin love the look of em!...i mean..what's not to like???...
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:55 am
by finboy
do want, only $1300 canadian, very tempting, damn i need a job.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:21 pm
by ekwatts
Fran wrote:Fran wrote:Pacafeliz wrote:
now, wait. there was an epi non-reverse firebird you say? when, where?!!!?
Pat.
I cant find anything online, but i've seen it. I'll get some pics and try to find out more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/945da/945dabdc529a95b2b1e8fd9ee335cb6ce2f37772" alt="Wink :wink:"
Right. My mistake, its an Eastwood.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4d9c/d4d9c93cdb78284be0bc6be7337f5045403bd9a4" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
Is it the one that came out as a Gould first before Eastwood snapped it up? I remember the Gould in Dawsons for something daft like £149 at one point (Yes! In Dawsons!), three P90s, sunburst and it played like magic and sounded fucking great. I should have bought that thing. Shoulda, woulda, coulda...
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:49 pm
by Fran
I had the Gould model, my mates is a red two pup version. Them Goulds were nice...
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:55 pm
by JohnnyTheBoy
I've just read Noel Gallagher used a reverse firebird on Morning Glory..
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 4:09 pm
by Medicine Melancholy
The body shape is cool but I don't like the overall look of the guitar, it's too furniturey or something, reminds me of an 1950s kitchen. A lot of Gibsons seem to go for this look though, it has an "old school" vibe. I don't quite get it.
Posted: Sun Jul 31, 2011 7:12 pm
by Dave
Looks like someone French polished a turd.