Fender Pro-Reverb + Bassman on Kijiji

Pickups, pedals, amps, cabs, combos

Moderated By: mods

User avatar
Lucamo
.
.
Posts: 1689
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Peterborough, Ontario

Fender Pro-Reverb + Bassman on Kijiji

Post by Lucamo »

I recently heard a Fender Pro-Reverb at a local vintage shop and I was blown away. The guy was dialing in tones I could not deal with. They were so good.
The amp was also selling for like $5000.

Are there any modern equivilants to the Pro-Reverb? I know it is does not have a re-issue, but are their any Fender amps that have a similar circuit board. Or even other companies?

It is essentially the best amp I have ever heard. |But there is no way I am paying vintage prices, poop.
Last edited by Lucamo on Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
theshadowofseattle wrote: Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.
User avatar
kim
[='±'=]
Posts: 12832
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:30 am
Location: BE

Post by kim »

i will pretend i didn't see the price mentioned and keep believing somewhere out there there is an amp i need to hear in person.
User avatar
foofoo982
.
.
Posts: 286
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:44 pm
Location: Madison, WI/Iowa City, IA

Post by foofoo982 »

Silverface Pro-Reverbs are usually around $700-$1000 around here. You may want to look into Bandmaster Reverbs or Dual Showman Reverbs. If you look at the silverface or even reissue stuff, it shouldn't go over $1500 and will get you really close to the classic Fender sounds. Was this amp an early Blackface example in pristine condition? $5000 seems high...
User avatar
the_other_Adam
.
.
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:46 pm
Location: Wichita, KS

Post by the_other_Adam »

I've read somewhere that the Pro Reverb is the same circuit as the Super Reverb, it just has a different speaker format. 2x12 instead of 4x10. $5000 is absurd for any amp. These can be had for much, much less.
User avatar
71Smallbox
.
.
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
Location: Springsteen

Post by 71Smallbox »

The Super Reverb has a middle tone control which is missing on the Pro Reverb, but overall there's not much difference circuit-wise. These are awesome amps and can be found for well under 5k, that price is ridiculous.
User avatar
avj
A Select Individual
Posts: 1259
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:54 am
Location: Detroitish.

Post by avj »

I would also agree that $5000 is absolutely ridiculous for a Pro Reverb of any age or condition. For comparison, here are the used Pro Reverbs at Guitar Centers (known for inflated vintage pricing) across America:

Used Pro Reverbs @ Guitar Center

I don't think they ship internationally, but at least you have an idea of the prices as they are in a giant American chain store. The most expensive one on hand -- a weathered '65 -- is $2400.

One of my friends has a SF ('78) Pro Reverb and I always thought it sounded great. In 2007, there was one for sale at our local music shop for $700 and he traded a Mesa Boogie Maverick for it -- which of course made the shop owners incredibly happy. I think he ended up with a few Boss pedals out of the deal too, but I digress. It's a fantastic-sounding amp and its 40W+2x12 always a great compliment to the 100W+1x15 Vibrosonic Reverb I use.

As mentioned already, for the most part the BF Super, Pro, and Bandmaster Reverbs (AB763) and the SF Super, Pro, and Bandmaster Reverbs (AA1069) were the same circuit, differing only in speaker config. There were a few different variations and deviations over time, and it seems for some reason each amp's schematic showed the same circuit number but varied slightly -- compared to the early 70s circuit for the Twin/Quad/Vibrosonic/Dual Showman/Super Six Reverb, which shared a more sensible schematic with notes for speaker configuration:
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Lucamo
.
.
Posts: 1689
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Peterborough, Ontario

Post by Lucamo »

Thanks for all the info guys!

AVJ thanks for clarifying that the super, pro and bandmaster are all similar.
It helped out a lot.

I think the amp was actually selling for over 3k, I was being dramatic to imply that I'd never, ever buy it.
theshadowofseattle wrote: Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.
User avatar
Lucamo
.
.
Posts: 1689
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Peterborough, Ontario

Post by Lucamo »

I know Bassmans are not the same as a pro-reverb at all, but is this a good deal?

Bassman Head
theshadowofseattle wrote: Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.
User avatar
laterallateral
Traynor or Death
Posts: 5950
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:15 am
Location: Montery Howl

Post by laterallateral »

By local standards, I would call that a fair deal, yeah. It looks pretty clean.
Missing badge hurts it's resale value a little. I'd offer five.
Last edited by laterallateral on Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by laterallateral on Fri Sep 19, 2014 3:05 pm; edited 115,726 times in total
User avatar
71Smallbox
.
.
Posts: 2308
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
Location: Springsteen

Post by 71Smallbox »

That's a good price. It will sound awesome too!
User avatar
Haze
.
.
Posts: 4924
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:27 am
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by Haze »

way different amps than pro reverbs and the like, you have to play one to know :roll:
User avatar
Lucamo
.
.
Posts: 1689
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Peterborough, Ontario

Post by Lucamo »

Haze wrote:way different amps than pro reverbs and the like, you have to play one to know :roll:
Ya I figure it is way different, but I also assume any Vintage Fender will sound good to me.
theshadowofseattle wrote: Maybe it's not the shemale porn in your post that matters. Maybe it's the shemale porn in your heart.