Page 1 of 2
Epiphone Dot vs Hagstrom Viking II
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:24 pm
by mkt3000
That's the question.
Both are similar, yet different enough... and I don't own a hollowbody or semihollow and have been GASsing for one. And as luck should have it, there's one of each used on Music 123's ebay store with free shipping to PR... and I like them both.
The Dot appears to be in good shape, but the Viking looks like it's got some
scratches on the top (which would also explain the deep discount from new retail.)
So which should I get?
Scumbag Dot:
Redheaded Viking:
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:26 pm
by stewart
the headstock alone on the viking would drive me towards the dot. fucking awful.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:29 pm
by SKC Willie
the dot is going to have a fairly chunky neck and the viking is going to have a really thin neck.
to me, it all comes to what you prefer neck wise. if you're indifferent about that, I would do w/ the dot since I think it looks better. My favorite guitar next to my mustang is my epi dot. It's like a $100 guitar but I play it all the time. Couldn't imagine a better guitar for the price.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:31 pm
by mkt3000
I wish we had $100 Epi Dots down here
I actually dig the headstock on the Viking... it's like a pug: so ugly that I like it
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:35 pm
by UlricvonCatalyst
Personally I would hold out for an old Japanese one from the '70s or even a Korean one from the '80s. The former won't necessarily be as playable as either of those two, but will make up for that in character.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:42 pm
by Nick
For those who don't know about those Viking headstocks...it's actually the same as the larger three to a side headstock only cut across diagonally to do six in line. I myself think it looks out of place.
I picked up a Dot studio like that the other day at GC, just to see how a $200 semi hollow feels to my hands these days...I was actually quite impressed, it was a fun solid guitar. Don't know what the quality control is like on them but for the price the one I played was not bad.
I never have played a new Hagstrom...I liked my vintage one a lot, but I get the feeling they're quite different aside from both being the same shape and thin neck profiles (mine was full hollow thinline, I think these new ones are semi). The neck profile was the one thing I couldn't get along with on that guitar, but it comes down to what you like personally.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:17 pm
by mkt3000
Another challenger entered the field.
I got an offer off a local forum for this in exchange for my Gibsun Les Paul replica + cash for new pickups
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:45 pm
by GreenKnee
I've heard only good things about the lower-end Gretsch models playability wise, but apparently the 'Gretschbuckers' leave a lot to be desired. I have read that they can be improved by playing with the pole pieces, but a common upgrade is to standard Grestch Filtertrons, or the T V Jones versions.
Also, that Dot in your first post looks pretty nice, but I don't like the headstock on either the Dot or Hagstrom
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:54 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
do you want a thin semi-hollow or a big country box?
i'd get the viking if it had the fender-ish headstock, but i love the hell out of my dot (thin neck).
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:24 pm
by ekwatts
Gretsch.
I'd be all over the Hagstrom if it had the Fender headstock copy, but it doesn't and looks like a fat diseased gash, so fuck it. Gretsch.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:25 pm
by SKC Willie
hotrodperlmutter wrote:do you want a thin semi-hollow or a big country box?
i'd get the viking if it had the fender-ish headstock, but i love the hell out of my dot (thin neck).
your dot is the only one I've ever played with that thin of a neck.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:45 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
...and yours is the only one i've played with the fat neck.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:57 pm
by theshadowofseattle
Epi Riveria
Gretsch
Any other Epi hollowbody
Hagstrom
Dot
In that order.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:46 pm
by Nick
I loved the Epiphone Casino the singer in my last band had.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:51 pm
by SKC Willie
hotrodperlmutter wrote:...and yours is the only one i've played with the fat neck.
I've played a lot of the worn studios and they all have the bigger necks. The rivera and P90s semis have fat necks too. I haven't played too many of the series like yours (solid, gloss paint).
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:57 am
by timhulio
Why a Viking II? What's wrong with the standard reissue Viking?
Also, because there seems to be some confusion:
The necks on new Hagstroms are not thin and narrrow like the old ones.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:02 am
by Bacchus
Are Hagstroms not hollow, like Coronados and Casinos?
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:46 am
by Nick
My vintage Viking was hollow, but I'm pretty sure the reissues are semi.
Thanks for clearing up the neck profile info Tim....I got confused because when they were reissued they posted all these "some say they have the fastest necks in the world" type taglines on their website and ads, and in some of those pictures I'm quite sure they showed Vikings....false advertising I guess?
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:18 pm
by mkt3000
Decision made...
If the dude offering me the Gretsch pulls through, I'm going Gretsch. If not, then the Dot. The Hagstrom is cool, but since it's damaged, I'm concerned of how it'll arrive in PR after being bumped a few times in shipping.
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:08 pm
by Rox
I've played them both. Between the two ( and didn't want to admit it ) I felt the Epiphone played and sounded better .. Especially the Studios ... Maybe it's something to do with the lack of finish... I don't know ... Was playing them out of a Mesa TransAtlantic 15 .. The HBs seemed just as bright as the Hag's dogears..