Yeah,I wonder what it will go for. Here is the same guitar in 1973.
[youtube][/youtube]
and in 1979
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 1:54 am
by Josh
is it weird that I don't find these guitars appealing whatsoever?
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:00 am
by westtexasred
Josh wrote:is it weird that I don't find these guitars appealing whatsoever?
Nope,most of the other shortscalers don't like them either.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:12 am
by Progrockabuse
i'm not so keen on that particular burst, but i like les pauls a lot. the neck pickup of a les paul into a slightly driven amp is a wonderful sound to me.
the sheer money in originals going rate is mental, and bonamassa tours with 2 59's and a 60's! all pucker cost shitload originals.
think i'll stick to my vintage copy with it's burstbuckers.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:41 am
by Thomas
A lot of money for a refin that's also been modded in the past AND had a headstock repair.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:03 pm
by NickD
Progrockabuse wrote:i'm not so keen on that particular burst, but i like les pauls a lot. the neck pickup of a les paul into a slightly driven amp is a wonderful sound to me.
the sheer money in originals going rate is mental, and bonamassa tours with 2 59's and a 60's! all pucker cost shitload originals.
think i'll stick to my vintage copy with it's burstbuckers.
Same here, I like Les Pauls - I've had my Epiphone LP Standard for 23 years now!
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:42 pm
by Josh
dont get me wrong, they play and sound really nice. i just find them heavy and feel like i'm imitating slash while playing one. i used to own a wine red (kinda purplish) epi les paul, and and old harmony les paul copy. i didn't get on with either of them, they were both murder on my back. that being said, i do, however have a soft spot for les paul jrs (DC and SC) and black beautys (even though they're heavier than a standard)
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:53 pm
by pumpkin
gorgeous, now all I need is $250,000
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:20 am
by DGNR8
And it has J. Geil stink on it
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:36 am
by blane
The Heritage still makes them like they did in the old days... no weight reduction holes and no chambered bodies...
Living in Michigan I actually have access to quite a few dealers who sell them.. Almost all of the models I see in the shops though have been there for a really long time (the rubber guitar holder has rubbed off onto the neck finish) and as much as I want to love them... I just don't... I keep telling myself well, maybe a proper set-up and some fresh strings would help; but at $2300 that's a hell of a gamble to take.
On a side note why is it guitar shops always let their most expensive guitars live on the hooks with terrible set-ups and 3 year old strings?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:41 pm
by Progrockabuse
DGNR8 wrote:And it has J. Geil stink on it
Hope the last song he played wasn't this
[youtube][/youtube]
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:47 pm
by JJLipton
I'm kinda over Gibson honestly. Someday i want a nice les paul or a es 175 but for now I'm very happy with PRS. While playing les pauls i always felt held back by the cutaway and bulky neck heel.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:13 am
by Mo Law-ka
JJLipton wrote:I'm kinda over Gibson honestly. Someday i want a nice les paul or a es 175 but for now I'm very happy with PRS. While playing les pauls i always felt held back by the cutaway and bulky neck heel.
Bulky neck heel? PRS?
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:45 pm
by JJLipton
Mo Rawka wrote:
JJLipton wrote:I'm kinda over Gibson honestly. Someday i want a nice les paul or a es 175 but for now I'm very happy with PRS. While playing les pauls i always felt held back by the cutaway and bulky neck heel.
Bulky neck heel? PRS?
Touche'. Actually while playing lead I don't think it gets in the way.