Question about Princeton 112 Plus
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:02 pm
This post in the "worst gear you've ever owned" thread got me thinking:
That is the one thing I dislike about this amp, which I otherwise like the sound of, perhaps misguidedly. It makes me wonder whether the stock volume pots might have been linear taper rather than audio taper. Can someone verify this, or tell me how I can verify this (will the pots be clearly marked A or B if I open it up just to take a look)? If that's the case, a change of pots would--I think--give me a volume control that actually controlled the volume in some meaningful way.Billy3000 wrote: - Fender Princeton 112 plus - this was one of the 90's solid state princeton models and it sounded absolutely horrible. It picked up radio signals more than any other amp I've ever heard, it would randomly have squeeling feedback sounds for no reason while set to clean. The volume knob was also pretty much useless, it was either loud as fuck at barely 1 on the knob, or no sound at all. Those were the options.