Quality Les Pauls? ALso NGD: Jim Deacon Les Paul copy
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:47 am
My best mate just picked up a Jim Deacon Les Paul copy which I’ve borrowed for a while. I’ve been circling Les Pauls like a sexy vulture for a while…..I am now 100% sure I need one because of this guitar. In fact I’m thinking of offering him the 50 quid he paid for it. I’d really like a properly decent les paul and that doesn’t totally mean a Gibson in my head. I don’t care for paying for brand, I’d rather that money equalled build quality. I’m almost think that if I gave him 50 quid for this is any les paul really going to be 100-2000 quid better than this? What options are there for really fucking well made Les Pauls that look nice? What brands to avoid? Does anyone know much about Jim Deacon guitars? Where they were made?
Anyway on to the Jim Deacon….I have to say I thought it would be a piece of absolute shit but it’s NOT. Here’s why:
PROS:
It’s heavy as fuck. It appears to have a one piece back (I certainly can’t see any evidence of a laminate) and the neck is FANTASTIC. I’m guessing this is a chunky 50’s profile and is certainly benecol-friendly in the girth-stakes. Even though I have small hands I prefer a profile that fills out my palm. It’s got big fat frets that are not normally to my taste HOWEVER it instantly got me blues-noodling and I am a BENDWHORE with that kind of stuff, very very easy bending action. The whole thing feels solid as a rock. You could easily beat a man to death with it for you looking at you a bit funny in a pub. The hardware seems perfectly good and not noticeably lesser quality than any other TOM/stop-tail.
Cons:
It’s heavy as fuck. The inlays on the neck aren’t very spesh and look more plastic than the real deal. Plastic nut. The colour is kind of gross. It’s ALMOST 70’s cool, but the fairly plain wood laminate on top doesn’t do much to help the poo/urine-burst. The back and neck is a nice deep wine red however. Boring plain headstock. It’s obviously got some Asian style electrics in it but that is not necessarily a con. Initial plug in to the amp didn’t blow me away tone wise (but then neither does my amp any way). Without distortion the bridge was a bit honky. Somewhere between my playing and hitting the amp it lost the subtleties of my blues-finger™.
Anyway on to the Jim Deacon….I have to say I thought it would be a piece of absolute shit but it’s NOT. Here’s why:
PROS:
It’s heavy as fuck. It appears to have a one piece back (I certainly can’t see any evidence of a laminate) and the neck is FANTASTIC. I’m guessing this is a chunky 50’s profile and is certainly benecol-friendly in the girth-stakes. Even though I have small hands I prefer a profile that fills out my palm. It’s got big fat frets that are not normally to my taste HOWEVER it instantly got me blues-noodling and I am a BENDWHORE with that kind of stuff, very very easy bending action. The whole thing feels solid as a rock. You could easily beat a man to death with it for you looking at you a bit funny in a pub. The hardware seems perfectly good and not noticeably lesser quality than any other TOM/stop-tail.
Cons:
It’s heavy as fuck. The inlays on the neck aren’t very spesh and look more plastic than the real deal. Plastic nut. The colour is kind of gross. It’s ALMOST 70’s cool, but the fairly plain wood laminate on top doesn’t do much to help the poo/urine-burst. The back and neck is a nice deep wine red however. Boring plain headstock. It’s obviously got some Asian style electrics in it but that is not necessarily a con. Initial plug in to the amp didn’t blow me away tone wise (but then neither does my amp any way). Without distortion the bridge was a bit honky. Somewhere between my playing and hitting the amp it lost the subtleties of my blues-finger™.