Opinions on EH IC Big Muffs
Moderated By: mods
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen
Opinions on EH IC Big Muffs
Hello all, I have a possible line on a very reasonably 1979/78 one of these and I want the general opinion of these. Are they that different sounding from the other transistor units to justify owning both?
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen
benecol wrote:My band only exists in my head, I'm afraid. That said, it's a bit different from yer regular muff, in my opinion: less smooth, more raspy and synthetic sounding. Filthy. I love it.
cur wrote:I need it to be smaller or I get shitty messages from mezz telling me my junk's too big.
Chico Malo wrote:This thread just went down the toilet. Bye
iCEByTes wrote:Carrot´s and pussy party
oh whoope i missed the detail that it was used. thought you were looking in general so a build or something71Smallbox wrote:I am quite capable with an iron, so I could do this myself. I'll see if this happens and fill you guys in later on my impressions.George wrote:you could also tenure an ss pedal builder to add a mid control
His was coupled with an MXR Dist 2, but that might have just been for the lead lines, I'm sure someone else can verify. I saw them live just before Meloncollie came out and the guitars sounded incredible, if that supports anything.George wrote:is corgans stock or modded? he fits in a mix nicely
you could also tenure an ss pedal builder to add a mid control
i love the sound of them. best muff in my opinion but not exactly a normal muff
iCEByTes wrote:5 Most Jizz face maker Solo�s , classic Rock music i ever listened.
iCEByTes wrote:Blunt a joint , Take the Touch , Listen this.
- light rail coyote
- .
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 8:01 am
- Location: Rena, Norway
- Contact:
- Concretebadger
- .
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2012 5:29 pm
- Location: Leeds Leeds LEEDS
- Contact:
It has a Muff sound but is noticeably different from the transistor versions. There's something sweet and grunge-y going on in the midrange - not that it isn't scooped, because it is, like all Muffs that lack a mids knob. There's this syrupy, three-dimensional crunch that's really thick and musical.
If your're after old-school Gilmour sounds or palm mutes that burst blood vessels, the IC won't do it. There's none of the crisp fizzle and 'randomness' of a transistor version. For a warm 'wall of sound' fuzz with the sustain up full, or something that does nice overdrive with the gain backed off a bit, it's great. It's my go-to rhythm sound, and is brilliant when you give it a kick from some other boost or dirt box in front of it. It really is different from the transistor Muffs but I LOVE mine.
It does depend on your amp though. I find that the IC Muff sounds better through my Boogie than it does through my Fender, and the transistor version is the opposite. It must be a frequency response thing (the Boogie is more scooped than the Fender).
If your're after old-school Gilmour sounds or palm mutes that burst blood vessels, the IC won't do it. There's none of the crisp fizzle and 'randomness' of a transistor version. For a warm 'wall of sound' fuzz with the sustain up full, or something that does nice overdrive with the gain backed off a bit, it's great. It's my go-to rhythm sound, and is brilliant when you give it a kick from some other boost or dirt box in front of it. It really is different from the transistor Muffs but I LOVE mine.
It does depend on your amp though. I find that the IC Muff sounds better through my Boogie than it does through my Fender, and the transistor version is the opposite. It must be a frequency response thing (the Boogie is more scooped than the Fender).
-
- .
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 11:13 am
- Location: Birmingham, UK
No dude. Corgan never used the Big Muffs live. He even wrote a post about how, after Siamese Dream was recorded, they used the Muffs for a show and it sounded terrible. Sounding good on a record doesn't mean it sounds good in a band mix, c'mon.George wrote:is corgans stock or modded? he fits in a mix nicely
you could also tenure an ss pedal builder to add a mid control
i love the sound of them. best muff in my opinion but not exactly a normal muff
Yeah, he and Iha ditched Muffs for live use after the first gig of Siamese tour due to the guitars being swallowed up in the mix. Definitely used Mesa preamp dirt live after that, certainly for most Dream/Mellon Collie era gigs.
Also one of the things Devi Ever said about him that really set him off was spawned by a convo where she showed him a fuzz and he said "can't use 'em live though, unfortunately" and she went down a "why, cause you ain't cool or adventurous anymore?" type of avenue in a blog post about the exchange.
Also one of the things Devi Ever said about him that really set him off was spawned by a convo where she showed him a fuzz and he said "can't use 'em live though, unfortunately" and she went down a "why, cause you ain't cool or adventurous anymore?" type of avenue in a blog post about the exchange.
Aug wrote:which one of you bastards sent me an ebay question asking if you can get teh kurdtz with that 64 mustang?
robertOG wrote:fran & paul are some of the original gangstas of the JS days when you'd have to say "phuck"
a lot of muffs do this. so add a mid controlMrJamesBrown wrote:No dude. Corgan never used the Big Muffs live. He even wrote a post about how, after Siamese Dream was recorded, they used the Muffs for a show and it sounded terrible. Sounding good on a record doesn't mean it sounds good in a band mix, c'mon.George wrote:is corgans stock or modded? he fits in a mix nicely
you could also tenure an ss pedal builder to add a mid control
i love the sound of them. best muff in my opinion but not exactly a normal muff
- 71Smallbox
- .
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 8:32 pm
- Location: Springsteen