Page 1 of 2

whats a nice eq curve for a bass amp with a graphic equalize

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:25 pm
by George
r?

i'm after a nice punchy vintage sound. not too toppy or scooped

Image

it has a bass pot, graphic eq in the middle, and a treble pot.

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 8:47 pm
by spirograph
ive always used graphic eqs reductively, so i guess you could try removing freqs from the bottom first, to get some of the modern thunderyness that that amp probly has, n then take some from the top to stop it sounding thin n brittle (if it indeed does). id do that after setting the pots. give that a go.

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:00 pm
by Doog
Lolz, it's not a Megadrive cheat code, mate.

Experiment.

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:04 pm
by theshadowofseattle
Doog wrote:Lolz, it's not a Megadrive cheat code, mate.

Experiment.
*flies by on bass amp trailing gold Sonic the Hedgehog rings*

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:05 pm
by George
give me a ball park i dont understand amps very good

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:50 pm
by spirograph
a grimace?!

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:47 pm
by Ankhanu
~1.75 of a sine wave starting at 0.7. That's about where I tend to get things, but, yeah, experiment.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:07 am
by Sloan
vintage sound would be a neck pickup or whatever pickup is closest to the neck.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:03 am
by Viljami
I have the RB9 but I never ever touch the EQ, because it's too complicated for my simple needs and I can get "the" sound with just the pots. I guess the trick could be to roll off some of the higher frequencies to get that low HUMM that at least I associate with 'vintagey' bass sound.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:29 pm
by Doog
theshadowofseattle wrote:
Doog wrote:Lolz, it's not a Megadrive cheat code, mate.

Experiment.
*flies by on bass amp trailing gold Sonic the Hedgehog rings*
STOPWITHTHEWORKLOLSALREADY

You just gotta sit down with the equipment and listen to what each control does, and how it fits in (or otherwise) to the kinda sound you're after.

And don't be afraid of the bass' tone control; it'll control frequencies in a place that no amp dial can.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 1:41 pm
by Fakir Mustache
Sometimes adding a bit of low midrange and cutting some high midrange and highs can sound nice, depends what you're plugging into it.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:51 pm
by BearBoy
It doesn't matter how you set the EQ controls George, tone is all in the fingers.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:00 pm
by Mike
Christ on a Bike.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:32 pm
by JordanD
Like others have said, you're gonna get mixed messages as it's all opinion based.

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:39 pm
by George
my fingers are short and narrow, fairly dry skin factor and have a light flesh padding with smoothed medium gauge callouses, if that helps

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:02 pm
by Dave
Dip them in chocolate

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:47 pm
by BearBoy
Are they vintage or modern radius?

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:24 pm
by Bacchus
Doog wrote:Lolz, it's not a Megadrive cheat code, mate.

Experiment.
Probably my favourite post in the history of shortscale.

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:15 am
by George
so i tried it out last night with this band i'm trying out for (hence why i wanted some initial ballpark), with the eq in a soft smile with lower mids raised slightly, and upper mids and highs lowered a little bit. it sounded great. i even changed it slightly and it still sounded great. i guess when you have fingers like these, tone stacks become irrelevant. thanks to all who gave ideas though.

however, the real winner was an mbm fender blender with tone stack bypass engaged, which i used for big choruses and wigouts. such a good bass fuzz, mein gott.

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:50 am
by Mike
I never tried it on bass, I've a few on the list - will have to give it a rock next time!