No, just no.
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2018 12:31 pm
You been reading my YouTube comments on the fender channel?Thom wrote:Fender LANK
This.BearBoy wrote:I don't hate it either. Although the line of the pickguard/volume & tone control plate at the bottom is all kind of wrong.
Could have been much nicer with a few minor changes.
Doog wrote:These were announced in the summerJanuary, maaaaaan; stop living such a varied, fulfilling life and stare at the internet more:
http://www.shortscale.org/forum/viewtop ... c&start=20Doog wrote:Fender are literally just designing guitars in Photoshop now, and then building them, aren't they?BearBoy wrote:And this....
Can I get that distressed?robroe wrote:NEW FENDER LINK IF YOU DARE
What can I say, I was ahead of my time as alwaysBearBoy wrote:Doog wrote:These were announced in the summerJanuary, maaaaaan; stop living such a varied, fulfilling life and stare at the internet more:
I also like this... future oddball classicplopswagon wrote:oops, I think I like this shape...
I would like it better with a Duo-Sonic pup set up and bridge.dezb1 wrote:I also like this... future oddball classicplopswagon wrote:oops, I think I like this shape...
More interesting than all the cross designs.plopswagon wrote:oops, I think I like this shape...
If you use the search function to search keyword "lace cybercaster" you'll probably see every reply I've ever made to this heinous thing.Fran wrote:More interesting than all the cross designs.plopswagon wrote:oops, I think I like this shape...
Obviously there are borrowed ideas, but it's different enough.