Guitar woods and tone
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 2:51 pm
We hear a lot about body woods, neck woods, and tone. Over the years I've admired the musicians who refer to the tone quality they get from a type of wood, or from the age of the wood. When I was younger I'd think, "Man, I hope I develop an ear like that..." Over the years, I've become more skeptical and also more scientific about the tonal quality of the wood guitars are made of. So I thought I'd share my experience and see what other serious guitarists think.
My first guitar was a Harmony acoustic (55.00 USD in 1961). It was my guitar! What's "tone"? Later I got a 1963 Fender Mustang. Poplar. It's light and the tonal range through my Peavey Classic 30, as well as through my 1990s Danelectro Dirty Thirty, does not seem to be diminished by the soft wood. With 1963 pups and pots and wiring technology, the tonal range sounds pretty good, to my ear anyway. "Vintage tone". Amp tones can be adjusted as can pup tones, so there's always ample compensation for the effects of the wood on my tone. Which leads to my second point...
Second, the electric guitar tonal system has many variables. The pickups and the wiring network including pots are powerful variables. Then there's the amp which since the 1960s has become the most powerful variable in the electric tonal system. Never mind pedals which can transform any quitar & amp into a tone plethora. The minor variables are numerous. Cable, strings, nut & saddle, frets, wood, your pick.
The third point is about the wood variable. Here's what I've learned over 61 years of guitar playing and collecting: Within each species of tree, say Poplar, each individual tree has different qualities of the generic characteristics. This within-species variability is based on the different regions, climates, soil, rainfall, access to sun, age, history of illness or damage, etc. of the individual Poplar. The generic qualities of the species can be almost overridden by these highly individualized variables within the species.
I believe scientific studies have shown it's possible to identify the wood of an acoustic guitar when it's unamplified sound is analyzed, because the wood is a primary, powerful variable, and there are fewer variables in the purely acoustic tonal system. I haven't found any scientific analyses of solid-body electric guitars, through an amp, that detects the type of wood it's made of. If you have, I'm genuinely curious to know about that.
What does all this mean? To me, it means that amongst all these technical electric guitar & amp variables since the 1960s, our scientific measurement of electric guitar tones can not reliably detect the type of wood when you're playing any of your electric guitars. Now, if your ears can detect the influence of the wood, more power to ya. Even if that's placebo, it's real and it's important, especially to artists.
I'm curious what you think. -Doug Pratt, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
My first guitar was a Harmony acoustic (55.00 USD in 1961). It was my guitar! What's "tone"? Later I got a 1963 Fender Mustang. Poplar. It's light and the tonal range through my Peavey Classic 30, as well as through my 1990s Danelectro Dirty Thirty, does not seem to be diminished by the soft wood. With 1963 pups and pots and wiring technology, the tonal range sounds pretty good, to my ear anyway. "Vintage tone". Amp tones can be adjusted as can pup tones, so there's always ample compensation for the effects of the wood on my tone. Which leads to my second point...
Second, the electric guitar tonal system has many variables. The pickups and the wiring network including pots are powerful variables. Then there's the amp which since the 1960s has become the most powerful variable in the electric tonal system. Never mind pedals which can transform any quitar & amp into a tone plethora. The minor variables are numerous. Cable, strings, nut & saddle, frets, wood, your pick.
The third point is about the wood variable. Here's what I've learned over 61 years of guitar playing and collecting: Within each species of tree, say Poplar, each individual tree has different qualities of the generic characteristics. This within-species variability is based on the different regions, climates, soil, rainfall, access to sun, age, history of illness or damage, etc. of the individual Poplar. The generic qualities of the species can be almost overridden by these highly individualized variables within the species.
I believe scientific studies have shown it's possible to identify the wood of an acoustic guitar when it's unamplified sound is analyzed, because the wood is a primary, powerful variable, and there are fewer variables in the purely acoustic tonal system. I haven't found any scientific analyses of solid-body electric guitars, through an amp, that detects the type of wood it's made of. If you have, I'm genuinely curious to know about that.
What does all this mean? To me, it means that amongst all these technical electric guitar & amp variables since the 1960s, our scientific measurement of electric guitar tones can not reliably detect the type of wood when you're playing any of your electric guitars. Now, if your ears can detect the influence of the wood, more power to ya. Even if that's placebo, it's real and it's important, especially to artists.
I'm curious what you think. -Doug Pratt, Atlanta, Georgia, USA