Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:41 pm
by Mike
Reverb is way subtle. Sounds like it's a little bit hard in the response and sterile which is natural for a solid state amp I guess.
Would be interesting to hear how it handles pedals.
Sounds markedly better into the 4x12, completely unsurprisingly.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:43 pm
by Doog
Q: What is the difference between the Lunchbox and the Lunchbox2?
A: Nothing really, there is no production on the original Lunchbox anymore so every Lunchbox is a Lunchbox2.
Aah.
Yeah, it's not a valvey-sounding beast by any means, but I've read it takes pedals pretty well. Probably comparable to a Jazz Chorus, which sounded PHAT with my RAT.
The reverb on the BOX is supposed to be more like a very subtle ambience to get somewhere close to an open backed combo sound.
Dammit, Thomann can only offer this in the "lunchbox" stakes:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dfa1/6dfa12db6b512cf5dc578e08944c8ff9b43531eb" alt="Image"
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:34 pm
by stewart
Doog wrote:Yeah, it's not a valvey-sounding beast by any means, but I've read it takes pedals pretty well. Probably comparable to a Jazz Chorus, which sounded PHAT with my RAT.
*ding!*
interest piqued. i could see myself with one of these and a wee cab to save my back. i don't really like that fender i bought to replace the JC120. sounds ghey.
i'd been looking at crate powerblocks a while back but they've been discontinued and aren't particularly cheap on ebay.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 1:56 pm
by robroe
i am the only one that thinks 200w would kill a 6 inch speaker in like 10 minutes? or is my logic completely wrong
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 2:08 pm
by Doog
Size doesn't equal wattage handling.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:22 pm
by Markn951
^ that.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:33 pm
by endsjustifymeans
robroe wrote:i am the only one that thinks 200w would kill a 6 inch speaker in like 10 minutes? or is my logic completely wrong
Car speakers, compartment not trunk rattlers, are usually 4"-6"s or 6x9". They're usually rated up to about 250 watts RMS for the aftermarket stuff. That's 500w by bullshit marketing standards.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:33 pm
by Doog
Every schoolboy knows that.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:38 pm
by Will
I looked into them a while back, but I have a hard time believing they'd really be loud enough to "gig" with.
At a certain point, it doesn't matter how much wattage you put into a speaker - the speaker itself cannot move beyond a physical limit, and therefore cannot move anymore air. I'd really love to be proven wrong, though.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:40 pm
by Doog
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:42 pm
by James
Will wrote:At a certain point, it doesn't matter how much wattage you put into a speaker - the speaker itself cannot move beyond a physical limit, and therefore cannot move anymore air. I'd really love to be proven wrong, though.
Hi-Fi speakers that are the same sort of size as that can put out gig volumes.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:44 pm
by endsjustifymeans
Will wrote:I looked into them a while back, but I have a hard time believing they'd really be loud enough to "gig" with.
At a certain point, it doesn't matter how much wattage you put into a speaker - the speaker itself cannot move beyond a physical limit, and therefore cannot move anymore air. I'd really love to be proven wrong, though.
To gig I'd think this would need to at least be put through a 2x12. But if you're amps are all mic'd up... what's it matter. turn down a bit and let the PA do the work.
I've got one of those lil' smokey .5 or 1 watt amps, actually sounds great through my 4x12 amazingly. PRetty amazing for something packaged in a pack of cigarettes. Definitely not loud enough to gig with though...
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:44 pm
by Doog
Lulz..
Submitted 05/27/2009 at 09:52am by Kurtz
Customer Support : 10
My lunchbox fell off my halfstack while plugged in & turned on. It took about a 4' tumble. Completely my fault.
During Endless Nameless, one can only assume.
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:56 pm
by robroe
hilarious
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:15 am
by Doog
Sassy now, are we?
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:37 pm
by robroe
no i actually thought it was really funny.
no sarcasm this time.