Page 3 of 3

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:13 pm
by luke
BacchusPaul wrote:
Malik wrote:
euan wrote:Aye it says VI on the headstock
And it's blatantly a Bass VI anyway? Have you guys seriously forgot what one of those looks like? :shock:
No, they look like maruaders, hence the confusion. Kinda like a jag, but slimer and pointier.
Marauders always have a top horn control plate and never have a Jaguar bridge. And they don't have bass strings. :roll:

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:52 pm
by aen
Malik wrote:
BacchusPaul wrote:
Malik wrote: And it's blatantly a Bass VI anyway? Have you guys seriously forgot what one of those looks like? :shock:
No, they look like maruaders, hence the confusion. Kinda like a jag, but slimer and pointier.
Marauders always have a top horn control plate and never have a Jaguar bridge. And they don't have bass strings. :roll:
And they have the cock-stock!

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 6:57 pm
by luke
aen wrote:
Malik wrote:
BacchusPaul wrote: No, they look like maruaders, hence the confusion. Kinda like a jag, but slimer and pointier.
Marauders always have a top horn control plate and never have a Jaguar bridge. And they don't have bass strings. :roll:
And they have the cock-stock!
Well, we have to bear in mind there are like 9 Marauders. A few of them had the cockstock, some even had asymmetrical frets. But the fact there are only 9 and Fender have been reissuing the Bass VI from the custom shop for ages makes me quite confused as to why people thought Marauder first. Odd...

Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:07 pm
by paul_
the bass VI seems to elude a lot of people... some people must genuinely have a hard time recognizing it's massive scale just from the dimensions of it in pics, but the amount of times it's been referred to as a "weird jaguar" on guitar forums I couldn't even estimate.