Page 1 of 1
How long has this Viking RI been out?
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 10:34 pm
by Will
I just saw one of these today. Bolt on neck and everything - much closer to the OG then the other Viking RIs. Felt OK, but was $480 which seemed a bit hefty. The model is "IIP".
I don't even think these were at NAMM.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:08 pm
by jcyphe
What a travesty of design.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:14 pm
by othomas2
This model is nicer I think...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc4e3/cc4e3da3f94cde6a6f08ee59df10a03b9a737d01" alt="Image"
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:14 pm
by william
yuck.
headstock yuck, too.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:40 pm
by ultratwin
I thought this was going to be a thread about a kooky Gretsch reissue.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:09 am
by Sloan
i can dig
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:27 am
by MaMo
jcyphe wrote:What a travesty of design.
william wrote:
yuck.
headstock yuck, too.
suck a dick.
fuck yea for new reissue hagstrom archtops, authentic or not.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:04 am
by Nick
I hate the 70's fholes.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:23 am
by ekwatts
I don't understand what's going on with these. When are they going to do some proper reissues that actually look like the originals? It's like they're trying to do a Burns London but just not getting it right at all. It works for Burns because they make the bodies, headstocks and pickguards just like the originals, whilst slapping modern Wilkinson upgrades all over the place. It doesn't matter if the headstock of a Bison is married with a Marquee, they're still unmistakably Burns. Not so with these. None of these really say Hagstrom to me at all, which is made even worse by the fact that the two I've tried are really, really nice players.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:28 am
by Nick
That black one othomas posted is pretty close to a 70s viking, except for the set neck. I like the 3+3 headstock, since it's not the obvious fender rip off of the 60s and has its own identity. Also the new ones still use the coat of arms on the tailpiece which is another authentic touch,.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30009/300097b318e06511656dab6120d61e2f6dc82d02" alt="Image"
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:36 am
by Ty
I can dig it.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:51 pm
by william
the set neck just looks fucking wrong. the pickups are in totally the wrong place, and the bridge is up too far, and the strings atretch way too fat from the tail to the bridge. its an es335 with a harp tailpiece, not a viking. and the S holes are fucking awful.
the first one has a samick headstock. i dont think i need to say any more.
you can almost get a vintage one of these for that price.
edit- just to prove my point, if you want mine its 700 + shipping. it needs a new nut, and after i get it ill post it in classifieds. if someone seriously wants it, PM me and ill get on that motherfucker. its a 65 two tone burst, with no pickguard, all else is OG and in vg condition.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:11 am
by ekwatts
Oh, I totally prefer the Fender rip headstocks, totally.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:34 pm
by william
ekwatts wrote:Oh, I totally prefer the Fender rip headstocks, totally.
me too. to me thats one of the things that makes OG vikings neat. and its like a perfect fender HS shape, like a preCBS jazzmaster, with the slight curve, not straight like strat, not goofy like CBS. just nice.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:00 pm
by Mages
william wrote:ekwatts wrote:Oh, I totally prefer the Fender rip headstocks, totally.
me too. to me thats one of the things that makes OG vikings neat. and its like a perfect fender HS shape, like a preCBS jazzmaster, with the slight curve, not straight like strat, not goofy like CBS. just nice.
Yea +1 on that. but what are they gonna do, they obviously can't reissue that. they could do a slightly modified fender headstock like the later 80s Tokais or the ESP fender copies.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:04 pm
by robert(original)
didn't the fender rips have binding on te headstocks?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:11 pm
by william
robert(original) wrote:didn't the fender rips have binding on te headstocks?
on the viking IIs, not the Is.
mine doesnt, nicks does.
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:19 pm
by robert(original)
i always thought that was the sexiest thing evar!