Page 1 of 4
Squier CV New for 2010 Teles
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:31 pm
by ultratwin
Anyone else see these? I'm certainly curious about North American Pricing, but these are destined to be steady future sellers among teh believers:
Mahogany Thinline
'62 Custom
![Image](http://images1.thomann.de/pics/bdb/241197/2190111_800.jpg)
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:39 pm
by Pens
Fuck that 62 Custom is exactly what I want but in lefty.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:49 pm
by robert(original)
i really like that thinline, but i would like to see some color in the neck, and if the QC is as shaky as the cv duos then i would want to play one before i bought one.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:52 pm
by Mike
Wow those both look pretty tasty.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:57 pm
by robrtnickerson
Love the Thinline except pearloid kinda make me throw up a little in my mouth.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:57 pm
by ultratwin
robert(original) wrote:i really like that thinline, but i would like to see some color in the neck
Aye, deserves a clear-coat amber bullet shot up the
trussrod butt.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:58 pm
by robert(original)
HEYO~!
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:17 pm
by izodiak
If that 62' came in black, I would explode.
aaa.. grrRRRrreat.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:08 pm
by stewart
ooh, i quite fancy a tele custom.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:08 pm
by aen
I bet that 62 custom would make a fine baritone after a bridge change.
And as far as QC goes, Ive played liek 3 different CV 50s teles adn they were every bit as good as my MIM.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:10 pm
by DICHOTOMY
i dig the thinline a lot.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:12 pm
by Mike
What exactly makes the Custom a Custom? Am I stupid here? Looks like a standard Tele setup to me?
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:14 pm
by Josh
i was thinking more color options, and binding judging from the avri 62 customs.
but does the cv tele custom even have binding?
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:28 pm
by Haze
for some reason i want to buy the '62 and the og CV tele and switch the necks. That maple board looks very good, and i'm a maple neck tele kinda guy
![Image](http://images6.thomann.de/pics/bdb/241197/2190116_800.jpg)
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:36 pm
by MikeG
Yeah, pickups aside, I can't imagine what could be 'custom' about the 62 Tele.
It's hard to see what the Mexican Standards have got going for them now.
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:54 pm
by Haze
a fender decal?
fuck some of that, who cares. i'll play a guitar that says Cock Sucker on it if it sounds and feels good
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:54 pm
by othomas2
Mike wrote:What exactly makes the Custom a Custom? Am I stupid here? Looks like a standard Tele setup to me?
It's like the Tele '62 Custom reissue... them Americans made the black/nat one but there is also a burst Japanese one. Maybe more I'm not sure. It has the body binding innit.
But seemingly they are just remitting the 're-issue' part so no banker w@nker snob heeds get offended.
one example:
http://www.guitar.co.uk/guitars/electri ... ric_guitar
exciting news... more quality guitars to sell without feeling guilt.
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 3:39 am
by Mike
It must be the body binding.
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:01 am
by Bacchus
Soooo.... What the fuck is Fender for these days, if Squier is putting out this?
Basically, the best P-Bass you'd want, the best J-Basses, the best Strats, and the best Teles?
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 5:31 am
by paul_
Mike wrote:It must be the body binding.
Yep, plus teles at that point came with a white transparent blonde over ash finish with a single ply white pickguard, the custom colours (not to be confused with the Custom Tele which was 3TS) had the 3-ply guard like all the 60's tele re-issues. The Custom has double body binding (top and back). They're brilliant for doing it, I've always thought these looked so cool
I have an AV '62 Custom Tele bridge pickup in my main parts tele and it's the best sounding bridge pickup I've ever had in any guitar.