Page 1 of 2
New Eko Reissues
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:19 pm
by Rox
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:11 pm
by Nick
Each and every one is equally atrocious.
EDIT:
5 different headstock shapes on 6 different guitars.....wtf!? That having been said the upper left one is a headstock shape I approve of....reminds me of the italian PANaramic guitar I had for like 2 weeks
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:22 pm
by holyCATS1415
i liked the old EKO models, but these are awful.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:32 pm
by hotrodperlmutter
ugly guitar? slap a bigsby knock-off on it.
boom. still fucking ugly.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:37 pm
by jcyphe
These were posted ages ago.
Also these are boring because they look budget and the materials are not like the cool old accordion materials.
The 5th one is clearly the coolest shape and headstock based on one of the older designs.
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 8:32 pm
by Bacchus
I like the shape of the flying Y type thing.
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 2:27 am
by Rox
jcyphe wrote:These were posted ages ago.
Also these are boring because they look budget and the materials are not like the cool old accordion materials.
The 5th one is clearly the coolest shape and headstock based on one of the older designs.
I searched before I posted because I hate to be the noob that brings up the same shit already discussed . Nothing about their new stuff really . Got a link ?
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 3:34 am
by hotrodperlmutter
he just meant they were posted somewhere on the internet, not necessarily here. jcyphe is omniscient, you're not questioning him are you? ARE YOU?
i didn't find anything in a search, either. it's really a moot point, now, but it just has to be said that something's already been done/posted/forseen. you'll learn soon enough, rocks.
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:26 pm
by jcyphe
I did a search too and couldn't find anything but the search we have ain't the best.
I'm sure I posted these when they were announced or maybe it was even in Sub and Roach's NAMM photos.
I don't mind people posting stuff numerous times really but if they're going to do it we should atleast be free to say "SEEN IT".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b57a/3b57a45963edf9b5d1c6102e4d2c1f42c3cd97f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 5:08 am
by Rox
It's all good . I love razzing . Just remember if you're gonna dish it...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b57a/3b57a45963edf9b5d1c6102e4d2c1f42c3cd97f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
I'm considering one though . The Blue one but they also make one in a sunburst with this bowling sparkle in the coat . Sounds hideous but I think it will rock . They're ugly but different and they're doing shit folks won't dare to. Puro gatzi . Plus it's a medium scale like a Stang I'm told so it'll fit in with my Toronado .
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 6:31 am
by Viljami
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59122/59122841e200cb45a2444d8ecc78eab37a4df9bf" alt="Image"
and
notice a similarity?
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:09 pm
by Rhysyrhys
colabonham wrote:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59122/59122841e200cb45a2444d8ecc78eab37a4df9bf" alt="Image"
and
notice a similarity?
Im guessing its not the price?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b57a/3b57a45963edf9b5d1c6102e4d2c1f42c3cd97f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 2:14 pm
by stewart
looks a bit like a venus to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b2e0/5b2e02da50d798c681373325612eb0ef66970c59" alt="Image"
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 3:17 pm
by Doog
hotrodperlmutter wrote:ugly guitar? slap a bigsby knock-off on it.
boom. still fucking ugly.
irlols
They'd look
so much better with some minor shape-tweaking, although no doubt I'd just be subconsciously tweaking them back to whatever original model they rip off.
"Hmm, what's the most likely place the player's hand is gonna be brushing past every strum? Let's put a switch there, but have it orientated so that, while it won't move when knocked, it'll cause some nice bruises."
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 4:46 pm
by mellowlogic
These things look way too busy with the bigsby
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 5:38 pm
by westtexasred
My local store has an EKO hollow body like this for $250
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8fbf/b8fbf9b2778d5873532b5c1963c67404cc030021" alt="Image"
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 6:12 am
by hotrodperlmutter
Doog wrote:"Hmm, what's the most likely place the player's hand is gonna be brushing past every strum? Let's put a switch there, but have it orientated so that, while it won't move when knocked, it'll cause some nice bruises."
HA, wow. i didn't even notice that strat switch there. christ, yeah, i'd have my lower thumb buggered in no time.
actually, it's hurting right now just by looking at the orientation in the picture.
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:35 pm
by endsjustifymeans
screw all yall. I'd rock this and I'd look good doing it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74e33/74e3379f247957b37916d255eff7cc5b985e125a" alt="Image"
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 3:09 pm
by JJLipton
Those guitars remind me of cookies that get smooshed in the oven.
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 5:27 am
by Grant
hotrodperlmutter wrote:ugly guitar? slap a bigsby knock-off on it.
boom. still fucking ugly.
uglier. a simple stop-tail would be a vast improvement.